Belgium/Senegal: World Court Should Order Habré Extradition [1]

March 8, 2012
Senegal Refuses to Prosecute Chad’s ex-Dictator; Trial Should Move to Belgium
(The Hague) – The International Court of Justice (ICJ) should order Senegal to extradite the former Chadian dictator Hissène Habré to Belgium, Human Rights Watch and Chadian victims groups said today.
Hearings on Belgium’s application for an order requesting Senegal to move forward with Habré’s prosecution or extradition are scheduled to begin at the court on March 12 [4], 2012.

“The Senegalese government has made it quite clear that it will not prosecute Habré,” said Souleymane Guengueng [5], who nearly died during almost three years of mistreatment in Habré’s prisons before founding an association of victims to seek justice. “The International Court of Justice should order Senegal to send Habré to Belgium so we can finally have our day in court before all the survivors pass away.”

Habré, 69, who has been living in Senegal for 21 years, is wanted by Belgium on charges of crimes against humanity, war crimes, and torture committed during his rule, from 1982 to 1990. Belgium recently [6] filed its fourth request seeking Habré’s extradition after Senegal rebuffed the first three, part of what Nobel Peace Prize winner Bishop Desmond Tutu has described as an interminable political and legal soap opera [7] for the victims.

Under the UN Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment [8], Senegal must either prosecute or extradite Habré. In papers filed with the International Court of Justice, Senegal contends that it still intends to prosecute Habré. Senegalese officials, however, including President Abdoulaye Wade, have on numerous occasions publicly ruled out [9] putting Habré on trial.

During 2011, Senegal’s foreign minister, Madické Niang, said time [10] and again [11] that Habré would not be tried in Senegal. In July, Wade announced that he was expelling Habré to Chad – where he has already been condemned to death in absentia for unrelated crimes – only to retract that decision in face of an international outcry. In announcing the retraction, Senegal’s foreign minister again ruled out holding Habré’s trial in Senegal [12].

The government of Chad also announced in July [13] that it was in favor of extraditing Habré to Belgium. In 2002, the Chadian government waived Habré’s immunity [14] so he could be prosecuted in Belgium.

Habré was first indicted [15] in Senegal in 2000, but after political interference by the Senegalese government, Senegalese courts held [16] that they had no jurisdiction to prosecute Habré for extraterritorial crimes. They said Senegal had not incorporated provisions of the Torture Convention [8] requiring states to establish their jurisdiction over acts of torture committed abroad when the alleged perpetrator is in their territory. The decision and the surrounding political interference were denounced by UN rapporteurs on torture and judicial independence [17].

Other victims of Habré, including several Belgian citizens, then filed a case against Habré in Belgium. After four years of investigation, a Belgian judge in September 2005 requested Habré’s extradition. A Senegalese court ruled [18] that it lacked jurisdiction to decide on the extradition request, however.

Senegal then asked the African Union “to indicate the jurisdiction which is competent to try this matter [19].” When the African Union called on Senegal to prosecute Habré “on behalf of Africa [20],” Wade accepted. The next four years were taken up with wrangling over the trial budget and framework.

As negotiations dragged on, and after Wade threatened to let Habréleave Senegal, Belgium filed suit [21] against Senegal at the ICJ in February 2009. In May 2009, in response to a request from Belgium for the indication of provisional measures, Senegal formally pledged [22] not to allow Habré to leave Senegal pending the ICJ’s final judgment.

In November 2010, the Court of Justice of the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) held [23] that Habré’s trial should be carried out by “a special ad hoc procedure of an international character.” Later that month, nations coming together at a Donors Round-Table [24] fully funded the projected trial budget while the African Union responded to the ECOWAS court decision by proposing a special court [25] within the Senegalese justice system with some judges appointed by the African Union. In May 2011, however, Senegal withdrew from negotiations with the African Union [26] over creation of the court.

Since then, a Senegalese appeals court has refused to rule on two more Belgian extradition requests because it concluded that the legal papers were not in order. In both cases, the Senegalese government apparently did not transmit [27] the Belgian legal papers intact to the court.

“The Senegalese government has given the victims the run-around for 21 years, and is now trying to pull the wool over the ICJ’s eyes,” said Jacqueline Moudeïna [28], lawyer for the victims and president of the Chadian Association for the Promotion of Human Rights. “The ICJ should call a halt to Senegal’s shenanigans.”

The ICJ, which sits in The Hague, is the United Nations’ highest court. The court deals generally with cases between UN member states and it has no jurisdiction to prosecute individuals. Its rulings can be legally binding on states.

Belgium’s application charges that Senegal has violated the Torture Convention [8] and its obligations under customary international law by failing to prosecute or extradite Habré.

In May 2006, the United Nations Committee against Torture found [29] that Senegal had violated the Torture Convention and called on Senegal to prosecute or extradite Habré. In July 2011, Navi Pillay, the UN high commissioner for human rights, reminded [30] the Senegalese government that “[i]t is a violation of international law to shelter a person who has committed torture or other crimes against humanity, without prosecuting or extraditing him.” In November 2011, the Committee against Torture’s rapporteur again reminded [31] Senegal of its obligations.

In July 2011, the Chadian government complained [13] that “[w]hile some victims have died and others wait for over two decades for justice, Hissène Habré, accused of extremely serious crimes, continues to enjoy his comfortable exile in Dakar, Senegal.”

The public hearings at the ICJ will extend until March 21. A ruling is not expected for a few months.

Habré ruled Chad from 1982 until he was deposed in 1990 by President Idriss Déby Itno and fled to Senegal. His one-party regime was marked by widespread atrocities, including waves of ethnic campaigns and systematic torture. Files of Habré’s political police [32], the Direction de la Documentation et de la Sécurité (DDS), which were discovered [33] by Human Rights Watch in 2001, reveal [34] the names of 1,208 people who were killed or died in detention and 12,321 victims of different human rights violations.


Source URL: http://www.hrw.org/news/2012/03/08/belgiumsenegal-world-court-should-order-habr-extradition

Links:
[1] http://www.hrw.org/news/2012/03/08/belgiumsenegal-world-court-should-order-habr-extradition
[2] http://twitter.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.hrw.org%2Fnews%2F2012%2F03%2F08%2Fbelgiumsenegal-world-court-should-order-habr-extradition&count=horizontal&via=&text=Belgium%2FSenegal%3A%20World%20Court%20Should%20Order%20Habr%C3%A9%20Extradition&counturl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.hrw.org%2Fnews%2F2012%2F03%2F08%2Fbelgiumsenegal-world-court-should-order-habr-extradition
[3] http://www.facebook.com/plugins/like.php?href=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.hrw.org%2Fnews%2F2012%2F03%2F08%2Fbelgiumsenegal-world-court-should-order-habr-extradition&layout=button_count&show_faces=false&action=recommend&colorscheme=light&width=100&height=21&font=&locale=
[4] http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/files/144/16925.pdf
[5] http://www.nytimes.com/2001/03/31/world/he-bore-up-under-torture-now-he-bears-witness.html?pagewanted=all&src=pm
[6] http://appablog.wordpress.com/2012/01/18/transmission-dune-quatrieme-demande-dextradition-par-la-belgique-au-senegal-a-lencontre-de-m-hissene-habre/
[7] http://www.hrw.org/news/2010/07/20/senegalchad-nobel-winners-african-activists-seek-progress-habr-trial
[8] http://www2.ohchr.org/english/law/cat.htm
[9] http://www.seneweb.com/news/Afrique/abdoulaye-wade-se-declare-dessaisi-du-proces-de-hissene-habre_n_40995.html
[10] http://video.senego.com/la-declaration-de-madicke-niang/sur-la-suspension-de-la-mesure-dextradition-de-hissene-habre-video_0e5c0c6a8.html
[11] http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kbnjZttnsfQ
[12] http://www.rfi.fr/afrique/20110710-dakar-suspend-expulsion-ex-president-tchadien-hissene-habre
[13] http://www.infotchad.com/details.asp?item_id=2838
[14] http://www.hrw.org/legacy/french/press/2002/tchad1205a.htm
[15] http://www.hrw.org/legacy/french/themes/habre-inculpation.html
[16] http://www.haguejusticeportal.net/Docs/NLP/Senegal/Habr%E9_Cour_Cassation_Arr%EAt_20-3-2001.pdf
[17] http://www.unhchr.ch/huricane/huricane.nsf/0/6D27DFAAD462DFFFC12569310029C2C4?opendocument
[18] http://www.hrw.org/legacy/french/docs/2005/11/26/chad12091.htm
[19] http://www.hrw.org/fr/news/2005/11/26/communiqu-du-minist-re-des-affaires-trang-res-27-novembre-2005
[20] http://www.hrw.org/en/news/2006/01/24/declaration-hiss-ne-habr-case-and-african-union
[21] http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/files/144/15054.pdf
[22] http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/files/144/15149.pdf
[23] http://www.hrw.org/fr/news/2010/11/18/arr-t-cedeaoecowas-ruling-hissein-habr-c-r-publique-du-s-n-gal
[24] http://www.hrw.org/sites/default/files/related_material/Table%20ronde%20donateurs%20document%20final.pdf
[25] http://www.hrw.org/news/2011/03/22/senegal-accept-au-plan-hiss-ne-habr-case
[26] http://www.hrw.org/news/2011/06/09/senegal-habr-trial-illusion
[27] http://www.hrw.org/news/2012/01/12/senegal-stop-stalling-habr-extradition
[28] http://www.hrw.org/news/2011/09/30/right-livelihood-award-standing-victims-chad-s-ex-dictator
[29] http://www.unhchr.ch/tbs/doc.nsf/%28Symbol%29/aafdd8e81a424894c125718c004490f6?Opendocument
[30] http://www.ohchr.org/EN/NewsEvents/Pages/DisplayNews.aspx?NewsID=11233&LangID=E
[31] http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=296405470393182&set=a.153452781355119.27833.106827982684266&type=1&theater
[32] http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2010/03/08/inside_a_dictators_secret_police
[33] http://www.hrw.org/legacy/justice/habre/habre-police.htm
[34] https://www.hrdag.org/about/downloads/State-Violence-in-Chad.pdf


Senegal rejects extradition of Chad’s Habre to Belgium

January 11, 2012
Senegal rejects extradition of Chad's Habre to Belgium

Senegal rejects extradition of Chad's Habre to Belgium

(AFP) – DAKAR — Senegal’s appeals court on Wednesday rejected a Belgian request for Chad’s former president Hissene Habre to be extradited to face charges of atrocities committed during his 1982-1990 rule.

“The Dakar Appeals Court today rejected the request to have Hissene Habre extradited to Belgium. It ruled that Belgium’s demand did not conform to legal provisions” in Senegal, said an official from the justice ministry.

“Belgium did not respect the procedure,” he said, without giving details.

Belgium had proposed in July that Habre be extradited, with support from the Chadian government.

Reed Brody, a lawyer with Human Rights Watch who has spearheaded the case against Habre, said the ruling was not definitive.

“They did not refuse extradition, they said Belgium had not annexed the original arrest warrant and other papers” only photocopied versions, he told AFP by telephone from Belgium.

“It is purely a technical ruling. It leaves the door open to a fresh Belgian extradition request… it is not a definitive ruling on the merits of the case.”

Brody was part of a Belgian investigating team that visited Chad in 2002, where they visited detention centres and mass graves and found thousands of documents from Habre’s political police, providing strong evidence of torture and rights violations.

Habre, dubbed Africa’s Pinochet for atrocities committed under his rule, has been living in Senegal since fleeing his country in 1990 after being ousted by President Idriss Deby Itno. He had ruled for eight years.

A 1992 truth commission report in Chad said that during his time in power, Habre presided over up to 40,000 political murders and widespread torture.

While mandated by the African Union to put Habre on trial, Senegal has dragged its feet for years.

Last year, Senegalese President Abdoulaye Wade announced he would send Habre back to Chad but backed down at the last minute under pressure from rights groups and the United Nations.

The 85-year-old Wade, who is controversially seeking another term in office in an election next month, said earlier this month in an interview that Habre’s extradition to Belgium was imminent.

“Very probably, Hissene Habre will be sent to Belgium. I have referred Belgium’s request to the Dakar court of appeal. If the court decides it, he will be extradited,” he said.

Belgium has wanted to try Habre since 2005, when it issued an international arrest warrant for “serious violations of international humanitarian law”.

The Dakar-based African Assembly for the Defence of Human Rights warned that Senegal risks losing up to $50 million (39 million euros) in US aid if it fails to bring Habre to justice.

“More than 25 billion CFA francs risk being completely jeopardised by Senegal’s inability to comply with its international obligations and try or extradite Hissene Habre,” RADDHO said in a statement.

The rights body said that while Washington had earmarked the amount for Senegal, some US representatives had voiced concern over the lack of progress in the Habre case.


His name was Idriss Miskine…

January 8, 2012
Idriss Miskine (Photo: TchadSao Facebook Page)

Idriss Miskine (Photo: TchadSao Facebook Page)

On January 7, 1984 this man died. His name was Idriss Miskine. Comrade and confidant of Habré, he was poisoned by him. It is what his family and large sectors of the Chadian society believe to this day.
R.I.P.!


Affaire Habré : Le président sénégalais Wade déclare que l’ancien dictateur tchadien sera « très probablement renvoyé en Belgique »

January 6, 2012
Habre victims ( Photo: HRW)

Habre victims ( Photo: HRW)

(N’Djaména) – La déclaration du président sénégalais Abdoulaye Wade que « très probablement Hissène Habré va être renvoyé en Belgique » pour répondre aux accusations de crimes contre l’humanité, crimes de guerre, et torture suscite l’espoir des victimes, a déclaré le Comité international pour le jugement équitable de Hissène Habré. La déclaration, retransmise aujourd’hui, a été faite lors d’une interview avec Radio France internationale et France 24 le 4 janvier 2012 au Palais présidentiel de Dakar.

Le président Wade, qui avait catégoriquement refusé que Habré soit jugé au Sénégal, a déclaré que la Cour d’appel de Dakar, actuellement saisie d’une demande d’extradition belge, va « incessamment trancher la question ». Il a ajouté que « si la Cour d’appel décide de l’extrader, je l’extraderai » car il a désormais « l’aval » de l’Union africaine.

« Nous sommes rassurés de voir que les tribunaux vont bientôt traiter la demande d’extradition belge et que le gouvernement sénégalais tient à respecter la décision de la cour », a déclaré Jacqueline Moudeïna, avocate des victimes et coordinatrice du Comité international pour le jugement équitable de Hissène Habré qui comprend notamment l’Association tchadienne pour la Promotion et la Défense des Droits de l’Homme (ATPDH), l’Association des Victimes des Crimes du Régime de Hissène Habré (AVCRHH), la Rencontre Africaine pour la Défense des Droits de l’Homme (RADDHO), Human Rights Watch et la Fédération internationale des Ligues des Droits de l’Homme (FIDH). « Si l’indépendance judiciaire est respectée au Sénégal, il n’y a pas d’autre solution que l’extradition en Belgique car le Sénégal est obligé soit de le juger, soit de l’extrader ».

Les victimes de l’ancien dictateur tchadien luttent depuis plus de vingt-et-un ans pour le traduire devant un tribunal mais se trouvent devant une impasse depuis que le Sénégal, pays d’exil de Habré, a décidé de ne pas le juger, sans pour autant l’extrader vers la Belgique qui demande son extradition depuis 2005. La Convention contre la torture oblige les Etats parties à juger ou extrader toute personne accusée de torture.

En juillet 2006, le Sénégal a accepté le mandat de l’Union africaine de juger Habré « au nom de l’Afrique ». Au moment où les dernières modalités se mettaient en place l’année dernière, le Sénégal s’est retiré des discussions avec l’Union africaine et a déclaré qu’il ne jugerait jamais Habré. En juin 2011, l’Union africaine a fait le bilan de l’affaire et a envisagé d’autres solutions, y compris son extradition vers la Belgique. Le 22 juillet 2011, le gouvernement tchadien s’est prononcé officiellement en faveur de l’extradition de Habré en Belgique.

La Belgique a déposé une troisième demande d’extradition le 5 septembre 2011. La demande est toujours pendante.

En novembre dernier, le Comité des Nations unies contre la torture rappelait au Sénégal son obligation « de soumettre la présente affaire à ses autorités compétentes pour l’exercice de l’action pénale ou, à défaut, dans la mesure où il existe une demande d’extradition émanant de la Belgique, de faire droit à cette demande ».

« L’extradition de Habré vers la Belgique constitue l’option la plus concrète et la plus rapide pour s’assurer qu’il réponde effectivement des accusations portées contre lui dans le cadre d’un procès juste et équitable », a ajouté Maître Moudeina. « Les victimes continuent de s’éteindre tous les jours et n’ont plus le temps d’attendre. La Belgique a déjà enquêté sur les accusations et est prête à juger Habré rapidement une fois qu’il sera sur son territoire ».

Le refus du Sénégal de juger Habré sera à l’ordre du jour au sommet de l’Union africaine à la fin du mois de janvier. Dès mars prochain, les audiences débuteront à la Cour internationale de Justice dans l’affaire qui oppose la Belgique au Sénégal visant à obliger le Sénégal à s’acquitter de ses obligations internationales.

Habré a dirigé le Tchad de 1982 à 1990, jusqu’à ce qu’il soit renversé par l’actuel président tchadien Idriss Déby Itno. Son régime à parti unique a été marqué par des atrocités commises à grande échelle, notamment par des vagues d’épurations ethniques. Une commission d’enquête nationale a estimé en 1992 que le régime était responsable de 40 000 assassinats politiques et de torture systématique.

Interview du Président Wade :

Rfi : Alors justement, Monsieur le Président, en janvier l’Union africaine aura à se pencher à nouveau sur le dossier Hissène Habré, vous savez qu’il y a deux solutions actuellement à envisager : l’extradition vers la Belgique, un éventuel départ vers le Rwanda. Quelle solution recueillerait plutôt votre avis ?

Wade : La Cour d’appel de Dakar, [est] actuellement saisie d’une demande de la Belgique, et incessamment elle va trancher la question. Mais très probablement Hissène Habré va être renvoyé en Belgique. Je ne l’aurais pas fait avant si je n’avais pas l’aval de l’Union africaine. Mais l’Union africaine nous dit, me dit, que c’est une possibilité et donc si la Cour d’appel décide de l’extrader, je l’extraderai.

Rfi : Donc juste en deux mots, vous êtes prêt si les formes sont respectées à ce qu’il aille en Belgique ?

Wade : Absolument ! Parce que j’ai le couvert de l’Union africaine. Auparavant je ne l’aurais pas fait.


(…) if you kill 40, 000 people, you get a comfortable exile with a bank account in another country (…)

December 27, 2011

Reed Brody, HRW

“If you kill one person, you go to jail. If you kill 40 people, they put you in an insane asylum. But if you kill 40, 000 people, you get a comfortable exile with a bank account in another country, and that’s what we want to change here,”
Reed Brody, Human Rights Watch


Chad’s Genocide: Missed by the Media

December 27, 2011

Masses of information from the media constantly bombard us yet, paradoxically, often the most important goes uncovered. Take for instance, Africa. A country like Sudan suddenly comes under the spotlight. Reports of rape, massacre and corruption in the Darfur region reinforce all the stereotypes about the “dark continent” of savage aliens. And then, just as quickly, Sudan will fall from view.

Masses of information from the media constantly bombard us yet, paradoxically, often the most important goes uncovered. Take for instance, Africa. A country like Sudan suddenly comes under the spotlight. Reports of rape, massacre and corruption in the Darfur region reinforce all the stereotypes about the “dark continent” of savage aliens. And then, just as quickly, Sudan will fall from view. However, while thousands of refugees from the Darfur conflict have fled to Chad, just to the west of Sudan, this country remains largely off the British and American media map.

And so one of the most remarkable contemporary human rights campaigns goes largely unreported in the UK as the Belgium courts seek to try the former Chadian dictator Hissène Habré for crimes of genocide during his rule from 1982 to 1990 – even in the face of the Belgium Parliament’s decision to repeal its landmark “universal human rights jurisdiction” statute. Following threats from the United States in June 2003 that Belgium risked losing its status as host to NATO’s headquarters, the 1993 historic law, which allowed victims to file complaints in Belgium for atrocities committed abroad, was repealed. Yet a new law, adopted in August 2003, allowed for the continuation of the case against Habré – much to the delight of human rights campaigners. And finally last month, Senegal, where Habré has been under house arrest, arrested the former dictator to face an extradition request from Belgium over the genocide charges.

Formerly part of French Equatorial Africa, Chad gained its independence in 1960 and since then has been gripped by civil war. In a rare instance of coverage on 21 May 1992, the London-based Guardian carried four short paragraphs reporting how 40,000 people were estimated to have died in detention or been executed during the tyranny of Habré. A justice ministry report concluded that Habré had committed genocide against the Chadian people. Five years ago, in a case inspired by the one against Chile’s General Augusto Pinochet, several human rights organisations, led by Human Rights Watch, filed a suit against Habré in Senegal (his refuge since 1990). They argued that he could be tried anywhere for crimes against humanity and that former heads of state were not immune. However, on 21 March 2001, the Senegal Court of Cassation threw out the case. And so, human rights campaigners turned their attention to Belgium where one of the victims of Habré’s torture now lives. Extraordinary events, but all of them hidden behind a virtual wall of silence in the West.

Yet also hidden is the massive, secret war waged by the United States and Britain from bases in Chad against Libya. British involvement in a 1996 plot to assassinate the Libyan leader, Colonel Mu’ammar Gadafi, as alleged by the maverick M15 officer David Shayler, was reported as an isolated event. Yet it is best seen as part of a wide-ranging and longstanding strategy of the US and UK secret states to remove Gadafi. Grabbing power by ousting King Idris in a 1969 coup, Gadafi (who, intriguingly, had followed a military training course in England in 1966) soon became the target of covert operations by the French, Americans, Israelis and British. Stephen Dorril, in his seminal history of M16, records how in 1971 a British plan to invade the country, release political prisoners and restore the monarchy ended in an embarrassing flop. Nine years later, the head of the French secret service, Alain de Gaigneronde de Marolles, resigned after a French-led plan ended in disaster when a rebellion by Libyan troops in Tobruk was quickly suppressed. Then, in 1982, away from the glare of the media, Habré, with the backing of the CIA and French troops, overthrew the Chadian government of Goukouni Wedeye. Bob Woodward (of Watergate fame), in his semi-official history of the CIA, reveals that the Chad covert operation was the first undertaken by the new CIA chief William Casey and that, throughout the decade, Libya ranked as high as the Soviet Union as the bête noir of the White House.

A report from Amnesty International, Chad: The Habré Legacy, records massive military and financial support for the dictator by the US Congress. It adds: “None of the documents presented to Congress and consulted by AI covering the period 1984 to 1989 make any reference to human rights violations.” US official records indicate that funds for the Chad-based covert war against Libya also came from Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Morocco, Israel and Iraq. The Saudis, for instance, gave $7million to an opposition group, the National Front for the Salvation of Libya (also backed by French intelligence and the CIA). However, a plan to assassinate Gadafi and seize power on 8 May 1984 was crushed. In the following year, the US asked Egypt to invade Libya and overthrow Gadafi but President Mubarak refused. By the end of 1985, the Washington Post had exposed the plan after congressional leaders opposing it wrote in protest to President Reagan. Frustrated in its covert attempts to topple Gadafi, the US government’s strategy suddenly shifted. For 11 minutes in the early morning of 14 April 1986, 30 US air force and navy bombers struck Tripoli and Benghazi in a raid code-named El Dorado Canyon. The US/UK mainstream media were ecstatic. Yet the main purpose of the raid was to kill the Libyan president – dubbed a “mad dog” by Reagan. In the event, the first bomb to drop on Tripoli hit Gadafi’s home killing Hana, his adopted daughter aged 15 months – while his eight other children and wife Safiya were all hospitalised, some with serious injuries. The president escaped. Reports of US military action against Libya disappeared from the media after the 1986 assault. But away from the glare of publicity, the CIA launched its most extensive effort yet to spark an anti-Gadafi coup. A secret army was recruited from among the many Libyans captured in border battles with Chad during the 1980s. And as concerns grew in M16 that Gadafi was aiming to develop chemical weapons, Britain funded various opposition groups in Libya. Then in 1990, with the crisis in the Gulf developing, French troops helped oust Habré in a secret operation and install Idriss Déby as the new President of Chad. The French government had tired of Habré’s genocidal policies while George Bush senior’s administration decided not to frustrate France in exchange for co-operation in its attack on Iraq. Yet, even under Déby, abuses of civil rights by government forces have continued.

Recently, relations between the US, UK and Libya have thawed, with Gadafi pledging support for the “war against terrorism” and agreeing to pay compensation to the victims of the 1988 Flight 103 Lockerbie bombing, for which a Libyan intelligence agent was jailed. But significantly, at his trial in November 2003, David Shayler was denied the right (under the European Convention of Human Rights) to speak out about the 1996 anti-Gadafi plot. Since it is obvious there are a lot of shady secrets from the years of the dirty war to conceal, such a decision by the court must have come as a relief to the government. And a report in the Guardian of 15 March 2004 said US troops were arriving in several African countries, including Chad, as the Pentagon warned that the region ran the risk of becoming an al-Qaeda recruiting ground. Giles Tremlett reported (“US sends special forces into North Africa”): “…US navy P-3 Orion aircraft guided Chad troops during a two-day battle on the border with Niger last week in which 43 suspected members of Algeria’s Salafist Group for Preaching and Combat were killed.” Oil reserves in North and West Africa are drawing increasing attention from the US. West Africa supplies the US with 15 per cent of its oil while the US National Intelligence Council has projected the figure will grow to 25 per cent by 2015.

___

Richard Keeble. February 2006

Richard Keeble is Professor of Journalism at Lincoln University. His publications include Secret State, Silent Press (John Libbey; 1997), a study of the US/UK press coverage of the 1991 Gulf conflict. This excerpt is taken from his blog on Media Lens.


We’re never gonna give up! We’ll keep fighting to see justice done for the thousands of victims!

December 24, 2011

Bring this P.O.S. to justice! Senegal must prosecute the S.O.B. or hand him to the international justice! It’s as simple as that. We’re never gonna give up! We’ll keep fighting to see justice done for the thousands of victims. I, for one, won’t quit. I owe it to my 9 years younger brother murdered by Habre’s soldiers in Deli. I owe it to my dad’s two brothers who were abducted and murdered during Habre’s iron fist rule. I owe my dad’s 15 colleagues cold bloodily shot and killed on a September morning in Deli. I owe it to the more than hundred people killed in Deli that day. I owe it to all the victims of Black September in Southern Chad, to the victims of the pogrom against the Hadjerai, the massacres of the Zaghawa, Arabs,… Yes, we owe it to ALL the victims of Habre and Deby’s dictatorships and to future generations to prevent something of this magnitude from happening again. It’s our moral obligation. It’s our duty!


Bring Hissene Habre To Justice!

December 23, 2011

Senegal has an obligation to put Hissene Habre on trial for his crimes committed against the Chadian people between 1982-1990. If Senegal doesn’t want to stand with the victims of that monster, Senegal must hand him to countries like Belgium that offer to prosecute him. I hope the legendary Senegalese “Teranga” ( hospitality) doesn’t mean giving a safe haven to criminals, mass murderers and torturers, genocide perpetrators like Hissene Habre. Bring Bring Hissene Habre to Justice! That’s all the survivors of Habre’s gulags, the thousands of orphans, widows, widowers, …the families of the victims have been asking for for more than two decades.


“Impunity is a cancer that prevents us from realizing our true potential” [1]

December 6, 2011
Jacqueline Moudeina, a leader in the fight to bring former Chadian dictator Hissène Habré to justice receives Right Livelihood Award

Jacqueline Moudeina, a leader in the fight to bring former Chadian dictator Hissène Habré to justice receives Right Livelihood Award

Jacqueline Moudeina is president of the Chadian Association for the Promotion and Defense of Human Rights (ATPDH) and has been the lawyer for the victims of the former dictator Hissène Habré since 2000. In 2001, Ms. Moudeina was seriously injured by a grenade thrown by security forces commanded by a former officer in Hissène Habré’s political police.
On December 5, 2011, Ms. Moudeina received the Right Livelihood Award 2011, which is considered to be the “Alternative Nobel Prize,” “for her tireless efforts at great personal risk to win justice for the victims of the former dictatorship in Chad and to increase awareness and observance of human rights in Africa” (http://www.rightlivelihood.org [4]).

This is her acceptance speech delivered at the Swedish parliament in Stockholm on December 5, 2011.

*****

Jacqueline Moudeina’s Remarks for the “Right Livelihood Award”

Honorable Ladies and Gentlemen,

Allow me to begin by sincerely thanking you for the distinguished honor that you are bestowing upon me through the “Right Livelihood Award.” This award recognizes me specifically but, beyond that, rewards all the human rights defenders in the world, and particularly in Africa.

Rest assured that it is a deeply encouraging sign for us, the human rights defenders, and especially for us, the women, who fight on a daily basis, in very difficult conditions, sometimes at the risk of our own lives, in a world where power is generally held by men. This award gives us the courage to continue our different struggles on a road fraught with pitfalls.

Fighting for victims is in my genes. I am a rebel who from an early age has been indignant in the face of abuse, and I cannot bear injustice. I have always felt this way and always will, as long as those who suffer injustice are ignored by their leaders and as long as justice is selective. Many have tried to prevent me from doing my work; many have tried to intimidate me, to psychologically and physically threaten me. But I have come to understand, as Alexis Voinov said in Albert Camus’ The Just Assassins, that “it isnot enough to speak out against injustice. You have to dedicate your life to fighting it.” Until now, no one has managed to discourage me or get the better of me. I will continue my fight.

Ladies and Gentlemen,

I will seize this occasion to tell you about one aspect of our struggle for human rights: the fight against impunity.

In the past twenty years, the international community has undeniably made major strides in the fight against impunity for the worst criminals. But in Africa, much remains to be done. On this continent, impunity is a cancer that, with its corollary disease corruption, has infected our body politic and prevents us from realizing our true potential. We, the members of civil society, are fighting against this cancer, from Tunis to Harare, from Dakar to Khartoum, and in other places like Abidjan, Tripoli, and N’Djamena.

And yet, this justice that I am speaking about is not a science in the making. It isn’t a utopia. It is the most fundamental form of justice: criminal justice that allows victims to wash away the worst horrors, that gives back dignity to men who were tortured, and that gives back courage to women who have lost hope.

You only need to look at our struggle to bring to justice the former dictator of my country, Hissène Habré, to understand that today, in the twenty-first century, more than sixty years after the Nuremberg trials, it is sometimes easier to resort to oppression than to abide by the law, easier to commit violence than to deliver justice!

Habré ruled Chad from 1982 to 1990 until his overthrow and exile in Senegal. During his reign, atrocities were committed on a large scale, waves of ethnic cleansing crashed down on individual groups, and torture was institutionalized. In 1992, a national Commission of Inquiry estimated that his regime was responsible for the death of more than 40,000 people and the disappearance of thousands of individuals, leaving in its wake innumerable widows and orphans.

The victims of the Habré regime, whom I represent, have fought tirelessly for justice for twenty-one years. But to date their struggle remains unfinished. Before leaving power, Hissène Habré emptied out Chad’s national coffers and has skillfully used these funds in Senegal to weave himself a powerful network of protection. And so, instead of allowing the victims’ case to be heard, Senegal and the African Union have subjected them to what Archbishop Desmond Tutu and 117 organizations from twenty-five African countries rightly denounced as an “interminable political and legal soap opera.” I would say even more: a true stations of the cross for the victims.

In January 2000, we filed a complaint against Hissène Habré in Senegal where he now lives. One month later, the decision by a Senegalese judge to indict Habré gave us real hope.

However, following political inference, denounced by the United Nations, the Senegalese courts declared that they lacked jurisdiction.

The victims then turned toward Belgium which offered them a path to justice. After a four-year investigation, a Belgian judge issued an international arrest warrant against Habré in 2005. The victims once again felt real hope that they might see Hissène Habré brought to justice for his alleged crimes.

But once again, the victims were disappointed when Senegal refused to extradite Habré to Belgium.

In May 2006, the UN Committee against Torture condemned Senegal for its failure to act and enjoined Senegal to prosecute or extradite the former Chadian dictator.

In July 2006, the heads of state and government leaders of the African Union gave Senegal a mandate to prosecute Habré “in the name of Africa.” It was another step forward.

But our renewed hope to see Habré tried was short-lived. For four years, Senegal conditioned the start of investigations on the up-front payment by the international community of all the costs of the trial. When the international community committed to such payment, President Abdoulaye Wade of Senegal suddenly refused to execute the mandate conferred by the African Union and, in June 2011, finally declared that Senegal would not prosecute Hissène Habré.

Since then, Belgium, a country to which I express thanks on behalf of all the victims, has renewed its extradition request.

But now, the African Union now talks of sending Habré to Rwanda and starting everything all over again. What an outrage! What a loss of time, when the surviving victims are dying one after the other! More than a dozen victims have passed away this year alone. A request to transfer Habré to Rwanda would entail many more years of waiting, the time that it would take for Rwanda to create an adequate legislative framework, to conduct an investigation, and to issue an extradition request, whereas a trial in Belgium could take place quickly.

This is yet another dilatory tactic by the African Union, and calls into question the institution’s commitment to the fight against impunity. With a few exceptions, African leaders, who say that they want to free themselves of the tutelage of international tribunals and the extradition requests of Western countries, are revealing that they form nothing more than a club of heads of states ensuring their own impunity.

It is time for Senegal to grant victims the justice that they have demanded by extraditing Habré to Belgium where he can be tried. The victims cannot wait any longer. Psychologically and physically, they have suffered severe trauma that has taken a heavy toll over the years.

The Chadian government itself, last July, requested, and I quote, that the “option to extradite Habré to Belgium to face trial be given priority.” Why is President Wade denying us justice? Why is the African Union failing to listen to the victims? Why do Senegal and the African Union not support the position of Chad, the country most directly concerned by this case, which is to see Habré tried in Belgium?

I would like to seize this opportunity today to voice the victims’ plea, and to call on Senegal to extradite Habré to Belgium, to enable them at last to obtain justice.

This case isn’t just about one man, however, but rather it is about one of the most tyrannical regimes of the last century.This regime is usually identified with one man, Habré, but we have not forgotten about his accomplices, the executioners and torturers who carried out the former dictator’s orders. These ex-agents of Habré’s terrifying political police, known as the “Documentation and Security Directorate,” must also face justice before the Chadian courts and must be removed from public service. This was already one of the main recommendations of the National Commission of Inquiry in 1992.

Some of these accomplices continue to haunt us by taunting and threatening us in our daily lives. But we will not drop this fight. I myself was targeted in 2001 for my involvement in the Habré case. During a peaceful march in favor of democracy, a police squad attempted to assassinate me with a grenade. Its commander was none other than a former torturer against whom the victims had initiated a judicial procedure in Chad.

This event illustrates the educational value of a trial: how could this former torturer still believe that a dictator’s weapon is more powerful than a judge’s gavel? Despite this attempted assassination, I have never relented, and I will continue my efforts until Habré and the other executioners are brought to justice.

Ladies and Gentlemen,

The challenge of our struggle, above and beyond the trial of one individual, is that of national union for a lasting peace in my country. Today, the trial of Hissène Habré and his accomplices would allow the Chadian people to begin, at last, the reconstruction of their country. And it is only at the end of this process that the Chadian people will be able to truly come together and enjoy a rebirth.

In the struggle to end the impunity of some powerful leaders, justice has so far been an elusive dream. But this award which you bestow on me today is a tribute to the thousands of victims, widows, and orphans.

And it is to these individuals that I dedicate this award. We will not give up.This award reaffirms that we are right and encourages us to continue our fight against impunity.

Thank you for your attention.

Source URL: http://www.hrw.org/news/2011/12/06/impunity-cancer-prevents-us-realizing-our-true-potential
Links:
[1] http://www.hrw.org/news/2011/12/06/impunity-cancer-prevents-us-realizing-our-true-potential
[2] http://twitter.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.hrw.org%2Fnews%2F2011%2F12%2F06%2Fimpunity-cancer-prevents-us-realizing-our-true-potential&count=horizontal&via=&text=%E2%80%9CImpunity%20is%20a%20cancer%20that%20prevents%20us%20from%20realizing%20our%20true%20potential%E2%80%9D&counturl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.hrw.org%2Fnews%2F2011%2F12%2F06%2Fimpunity-cancer-prevents-us-realizing-our-true-potential
[3] http://www.facebook.com/plugins/like.php?href=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.hrw.org%2Fnews%2F2011%2F12%2F06%2Fimpunity-cancer-prevents-us-realizing-our-true-potential&layout=button_count&show_faces=false&action=recommend&colorscheme=light&width=100&height=21&font=&locale=
[4] http://www.rightlivelihood.org


Statement of the Steering Committee of the International Committee for the Fair Trial of Hissène Habré

October 27, 2011

Hissène Habré Case: A Real Solution Or More Dilatory Tactics?

The victims of the former Chadian dictator Hissène Habré have been fighting for more than 20 years to bring him to justice in a fair trial so that he can answer for the crimes committed by his government from 1982 to 1990.

Despite our efforts, the time has come to face the fact that the justice tirelessly sought by the victims has not been forthcoming. We have been subjected since 1990 to what Archbishop Desmond Tutu and 117 groups from 25 African countries denounced in July 2010 as an “interminable political and legal soap opera.”

On July 22, 2011, the Chadian government took the responsible decision to ask Senegal to extradite Habré to Belgium, which had sought his extradition in 2005 after Senegal courts ruled that they could not try him. A new Belgian extradition request submitted in September is pending before the Senegalese courts.

Faced with Senegal’s clear and repeated lack of will to prosecute Habré, we consider that extraditing him to Belgium is the most practical and timely option to ensure that he can respond to the charges against him with all the guarantees of a fair trial. Belgium is the only country that has received and listened to the victims and that continues to offer them a path toward justice.

In Belgium, a trial could be organized quickly, which is essential given that many survivors have already died. The victims of Habré’s crimes should be able to testify about their experience and to participate actively in his trial.

A Belgian investigating judge, with the assistance of police detectives specialized in the prosecution of crimes against humanity, examined the charges for four years. The team visited Chad in 2002, interrogating Habré’s former accomplices and visiting detention centers and former mass graves. It seized and analyzed copies of thousands of documents of Habré’s political police (the “DDS”), which revealed the identity of 1,208 people who died in detention and 12,321 victims of torture or other human rights violations. This strong evidence allowed the Belgian judge to indict Habré on charges of crimes against humanity, war crimes, and torture, and allowed Belgium to request his extradition.

In addition to the time factor, Belgium offers the conditions for holding an exemplary trial:

An independent judicial system;
Respect for fair trial rights;
The capacity to investigate and try a complex case involving mass crimes committed more than 20 years ago in a foreign country, largely due to its experience in similar cases;
A civil party (partie civile) system, which allows victims to participate fully in the trial;
Use of the French language, which is spoken by the accused and most of the victims;
An environment conducive to raising public awareness around a trial that will take place far away from Chad, including freedom of expression and the ability to make video and audio recordings of the court proceedings to be transmitted in Chad; and
Free access to the trial for non-governmental organizations and journalists who can monitor proceedings and encourage public debate.

We take note of the willingness and availability of Rwanda to organize this trial, in response to an inquiry by the African Union. The offer brings honor to Rwanda, which has also suffered from atrocities committed on its territory and which therefore understands the stakes and the need for justice for the victims to foster national reconciliation.

However, we wonder whether this option, put forward by the AU, is yet another dilatory tactic which calls into question its efforts to see Habré tried according to the strict dictates of the law. The law offers a clear response to Senegal’s refusal, for more than five years, to discharge the mandate of the African Union: the extradition of Habré to Belgium.

Moreover, we are particularly concerned that additional years might be needed for Rwanda to enact a legal framework allowing its courts to prosecute crimes that have no direct link to the country, to secure financing for the trial, to restart a complex transnational investigation, and to request Habré’s extradition. Many more survivors would be likely to die during those years.

We both understand and share the desire to see Habré tried in Africa. More than anyone, we have relentlessly attempted to bring about such a trial for years. We filed a complaint against Habré in Senegal in 2000. We presented to Senegalese judicial authorities hundreds of witness statements gathered in Chad and an analysis of the thousands of documents uncovered at the DDS headquarters that reveal in detail the scope of the crimes committed. And, between 2007 and 2010, we mobilized the international community to finance Habré’s trial in Senegal.

Today the most realistic option to avoid impunity for the mass crimes allegedly committed by Hissène Habré, and the option supported by Chad, is to extradite him for trial to Belgium. We call on the international community, and in particular the African Union, to support this option so that the victims can finally obtain justice.

The Steering Committee:
The Association of Victims of the Crimes of Hissène Habré (AVCRHH)
The Chadian Association for the Promotion and Defense of Human Rights (ATPDH)
The African Assembly for the Defense of Human Rights (RADDHO)
Human Rights Watch
The International Federation of Human Rights (FIDH)


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 44 other followers