Senegal will lose US aid if fails to extradite Habre: NGO

January 11, 2012
Senegalese President Abdoulaye Wade

Senegalese President Abdoulaye Wade

Senegal risks losing up to $50 million in US aid if it fails to bring former Chadian dictator Hissene Habre to justice, a regional rights group warned Wednesday.

“More than 25 billion CFA francs risk being completely jeopardised by Senegal’s inability to comply with its international obligations and try or extradite Hissene Habre,” RADDHO said in a statement.

The Dakar-based African Assembly for the Defence of Human Rights said said that while Washington had earmarked the amount for Senegal, some US representatives had voiced concern over the lack of progress in the Habre case.

Habre, dubbed Africa’s Pinochet for atrocities committed under his rule, has been living in Senegal since fleeing his country in 1990 after being ousted by President Idriss Deby Itno. He had ruled for eight years.

A 1992 truth commission report in Chad said that during his time in power, Habre presided over up to 40,000 political murders and widespread torture.

While mandated by the African Union to put Habre on trial, Senegal has dragged its feet for years.

Last year, Senegalese President Abdoulaye Wade announced he would send Habre back to Chad but backed down at the last minute under pressure from rights groups and the United Nations.

The 85-year-old Wade, who is controversially seeking another term in office in an election next month, said earlier this month in an interview that Habre’s extradition to Belgium was imminent.

“Very probably, Hissene Habre will be sent to Belgium. I have referred Belgium’s request to the Dakar court of appeal. If the court decides it, he will be extradited,” he said.

Belgium has wanted to try Habre since 2005, when it issued an international arrest warrant for “serious violations of international humanitarian law”.


Senegal rejects extradition of Chad’s Habre to Belgium

January 11, 2012
Senegal rejects extradition of Chad's Habre to Belgium

Senegal rejects extradition of Chad's Habre to Belgium

(AFP) – DAKAR — Senegal’s appeals court on Wednesday rejected a Belgian request for Chad’s former president Hissene Habre to be extradited to face charges of atrocities committed during his 1982-1990 rule.

“The Dakar Appeals Court today rejected the request to have Hissene Habre extradited to Belgium. It ruled that Belgium’s demand did not conform to legal provisions” in Senegal, said an official from the justice ministry.

“Belgium did not respect the procedure,” he said, without giving details.

Belgium had proposed in July that Habre be extradited, with support from the Chadian government.

Reed Brody, a lawyer with Human Rights Watch who has spearheaded the case against Habre, said the ruling was not definitive.

“They did not refuse extradition, they said Belgium had not annexed the original arrest warrant and other papers” only photocopied versions, he told AFP by telephone from Belgium.

“It is purely a technical ruling. It leaves the door open to a fresh Belgian extradition request… it is not a definitive ruling on the merits of the case.”

Brody was part of a Belgian investigating team that visited Chad in 2002, where they visited detention centres and mass graves and found thousands of documents from Habre’s political police, providing strong evidence of torture and rights violations.

Habre, dubbed Africa’s Pinochet for atrocities committed under his rule, has been living in Senegal since fleeing his country in 1990 after being ousted by President Idriss Deby Itno. He had ruled for eight years.

A 1992 truth commission report in Chad said that during his time in power, Habre presided over up to 40,000 political murders and widespread torture.

While mandated by the African Union to put Habre on trial, Senegal has dragged its feet for years.

Last year, Senegalese President Abdoulaye Wade announced he would send Habre back to Chad but backed down at the last minute under pressure from rights groups and the United Nations.

The 85-year-old Wade, who is controversially seeking another term in office in an election next month, said earlier this month in an interview that Habre’s extradition to Belgium was imminent.

“Very probably, Hissene Habre will be sent to Belgium. I have referred Belgium’s request to the Dakar court of appeal. If the court decides it, he will be extradited,” he said.

Belgium has wanted to try Habre since 2005, when it issued an international arrest warrant for “serious violations of international humanitarian law”.

The Dakar-based African Assembly for the Defence of Human Rights warned that Senegal risks losing up to $50 million (39 million euros) in US aid if it fails to bring Habre to justice.

“More than 25 billion CFA francs risk being completely jeopardised by Senegal’s inability to comply with its international obligations and try or extradite Hissene Habre,” RADDHO said in a statement.

The rights body said that while Washington had earmarked the amount for Senegal, some US representatives had voiced concern over the lack of progress in the Habre case.


His name was Idriss Miskine…

January 8, 2012
Idriss Miskine (Photo: TchadSao Facebook Page)

Idriss Miskine (Photo: TchadSao Facebook Page)

On January 7, 1984 this man died. His name was Idriss Miskine. Comrade and confidant of Habré, he was poisoned by him. It is what his family and large sectors of the Chadian society believe to this day.
R.I.P.!


Affaire Habré : Le président sénégalais Wade déclare que l’ancien dictateur tchadien sera « très probablement renvoyé en Belgique »

January 6, 2012
Habre victims ( Photo: HRW)

Habre victims ( Photo: HRW)

(N’Djaména) – La déclaration du président sénégalais Abdoulaye Wade que « très probablement Hissène Habré va être renvoyé en Belgique » pour répondre aux accusations de crimes contre l’humanité, crimes de guerre, et torture suscite l’espoir des victimes, a déclaré le Comité international pour le jugement équitable de Hissène Habré. La déclaration, retransmise aujourd’hui, a été faite lors d’une interview avec Radio France internationale et France 24 le 4 janvier 2012 au Palais présidentiel de Dakar.

Le président Wade, qui avait catégoriquement refusé que Habré soit jugé au Sénégal, a déclaré que la Cour d’appel de Dakar, actuellement saisie d’une demande d’extradition belge, va « incessamment trancher la question ». Il a ajouté que « si la Cour d’appel décide de l’extrader, je l’extraderai » car il a désormais « l’aval » de l’Union africaine.

« Nous sommes rassurés de voir que les tribunaux vont bientôt traiter la demande d’extradition belge et que le gouvernement sénégalais tient à respecter la décision de la cour », a déclaré Jacqueline Moudeïna, avocate des victimes et coordinatrice du Comité international pour le jugement équitable de Hissène Habré qui comprend notamment l’Association tchadienne pour la Promotion et la Défense des Droits de l’Homme (ATPDH), l’Association des Victimes des Crimes du Régime de Hissène Habré (AVCRHH), la Rencontre Africaine pour la Défense des Droits de l’Homme (RADDHO), Human Rights Watch et la Fédération internationale des Ligues des Droits de l’Homme (FIDH). « Si l’indépendance judiciaire est respectée au Sénégal, il n’y a pas d’autre solution que l’extradition en Belgique car le Sénégal est obligé soit de le juger, soit de l’extrader ».

Les victimes de l’ancien dictateur tchadien luttent depuis plus de vingt-et-un ans pour le traduire devant un tribunal mais se trouvent devant une impasse depuis que le Sénégal, pays d’exil de Habré, a décidé de ne pas le juger, sans pour autant l’extrader vers la Belgique qui demande son extradition depuis 2005. La Convention contre la torture oblige les Etats parties à juger ou extrader toute personne accusée de torture.

En juillet 2006, le Sénégal a accepté le mandat de l’Union africaine de juger Habré « au nom de l’Afrique ». Au moment où les dernières modalités se mettaient en place l’année dernière, le Sénégal s’est retiré des discussions avec l’Union africaine et a déclaré qu’il ne jugerait jamais Habré. En juin 2011, l’Union africaine a fait le bilan de l’affaire et a envisagé d’autres solutions, y compris son extradition vers la Belgique. Le 22 juillet 2011, le gouvernement tchadien s’est prononcé officiellement en faveur de l’extradition de Habré en Belgique.

La Belgique a déposé une troisième demande d’extradition le 5 septembre 2011. La demande est toujours pendante.

En novembre dernier, le Comité des Nations unies contre la torture rappelait au Sénégal son obligation « de soumettre la présente affaire à ses autorités compétentes pour l’exercice de l’action pénale ou, à défaut, dans la mesure où il existe une demande d’extradition émanant de la Belgique, de faire droit à cette demande ».

« L’extradition de Habré vers la Belgique constitue l’option la plus concrète et la plus rapide pour s’assurer qu’il réponde effectivement des accusations portées contre lui dans le cadre d’un procès juste et équitable », a ajouté Maître Moudeina. « Les victimes continuent de s’éteindre tous les jours et n’ont plus le temps d’attendre. La Belgique a déjà enquêté sur les accusations et est prête à juger Habré rapidement une fois qu’il sera sur son territoire ».

Le refus du Sénégal de juger Habré sera à l’ordre du jour au sommet de l’Union africaine à la fin du mois de janvier. Dès mars prochain, les audiences débuteront à la Cour internationale de Justice dans l’affaire qui oppose la Belgique au Sénégal visant à obliger le Sénégal à s’acquitter de ses obligations internationales.

Habré a dirigé le Tchad de 1982 à 1990, jusqu’à ce qu’il soit renversé par l’actuel président tchadien Idriss Déby Itno. Son régime à parti unique a été marqué par des atrocités commises à grande échelle, notamment par des vagues d’épurations ethniques. Une commission d’enquête nationale a estimé en 1992 que le régime était responsable de 40 000 assassinats politiques et de torture systématique.

Interview du Président Wade :

Rfi : Alors justement, Monsieur le Président, en janvier l’Union africaine aura à se pencher à nouveau sur le dossier Hissène Habré, vous savez qu’il y a deux solutions actuellement à envisager : l’extradition vers la Belgique, un éventuel départ vers le Rwanda. Quelle solution recueillerait plutôt votre avis ?

Wade : La Cour d’appel de Dakar, [est] actuellement saisie d’une demande de la Belgique, et incessamment elle va trancher la question. Mais très probablement Hissène Habré va être renvoyé en Belgique. Je ne l’aurais pas fait avant si je n’avais pas l’aval de l’Union africaine. Mais l’Union africaine nous dit, me dit, que c’est une possibilité et donc si la Cour d’appel décide de l’extrader, je l’extraderai.

Rfi : Donc juste en deux mots, vous êtes prêt si les formes sont respectées à ce qu’il aille en Belgique ?

Wade : Absolument ! Parce que j’ai le couvert de l’Union africaine. Auparavant je ne l’aurais pas fait.


Me Wade annonce une extradition probable de Habré vers la Belgique

January 5, 2012
Me Wade annonce une extradition probable de Habré vers la Belgique

Me Wade annonce une extradition probable de Habré vers la Belgique (Photo: APS)

Dakar, 5 jan (APS) – L’ancien président tchadien Hissène Habré, en exil à Dakar depuis sa chute en 1990, va être ‘’très probablement’’ renvoyé prochainement en Belgique pour y être jugé, notamment sur la demande des représentants de personnes présentées comme des victimes de son régime, a indiqué jeudi le chef de l’Etat sénégalais, Abdoulaye Wade.

‘’La Cour d’appel de Dakar est actuellement saisie d’une demande de la Belgique. Et incessamment, elle va transférer la question. Et très probablement, Hissène Habré va être renvoyé en Belgique’’, a-t-il déclaré sur RFI

‘’Je ne l’aurais pas fait (extrader Habré) avant, si je n’avais pas l’aval de l’Union africaine. Mais l’Union africaine nous dit, me dit, que c’est une possibilité. Et donc si la Cour d’appel décide de l’extrader, je l’extraderai’’, a ajouté Me Wade.

A la question de savoir s’il est prêt à le renvoyer en Belgique ‘’si les formes sont respectées’’, le président Wade a répondu : ‘’Absolument, parce que je suis couvert par l’Union africaine’’.

A l’issue de son sommet tenu en juillet 2006 à Banjul, l’UA avait demandé au Sénégal d’organiser le procès de M. Habré. Pour ce faire, le pays a été obligé d’opérer une révision de sa loi.

Suite à une plainte des avocats de Hissène Habré, la Cour de justice de la Communauté économique des Etats de l’Afrique de l’ouest (CEDEAO) a demandé récemment la mise en place d’un Tribunal spécial, estimant que le Sénégal n’a pas le droit de juger Habré par une loi rétroactive.

L’arrêt de la Cour a été rendu au moment où le Sénégal s’apprêtait à abriter une rencontre des bailleurs de fonds pour le financement du procès de l’ancien homme fort de Ndjamena.

Commentant le verdict rendu par la Cour de justice de la CEDEAO, le président Wade considère qu’il y a ’’une contradiction’’ entre cette décision et le souhait de l’Union africaine de faire juger Habré par le Sénégal.

Partant, les autorités sénégalaises avaient annoncé avoir décidé de retourner à l’Union africaine le dossier de l’ancien président tchadien Hissène Habré, mais exprimé le souhait que celui-ci “soit jugé en terre africaine.

Il devait être rapatrié vers son pays le 11 juillet dernier par les autorités sénégalaises, qui ont interrompu ce processus, à la demande expresse de Navi Pillay, le Haut commissaire des Nations unies aux droits de l’homme.

De nombreuses organisations notamment de défense des droits de l’homme ont en effet fait valoir qu’Hissène Habré ne peut bénéficier dans son pays d’un procès équitable. Ils ont demandé qu’il soit donc extradé vers la Belgique qui a déjà formulé une demande dans ce sens.

Présumé coupable de crimes contre l’humanité et de crimes de guerre, Hissène Habré a admis dans une interview parue dans l’hebdomadaire sénégalais La Gazette (privée), que des dérives et des règlements de comptes ont été commis au Tchad sous son régime. Il a sur cette base demandé à être jugé par une juridiction internationale indépendante.

‘’Je ne nie pas que sous mon régime il y a eu des dérives ou ce qu’on appelle des bavures. […] Incontestablement, il y a [eu] des règlements de comptes, je ne le nie pas’’, a-t-il dit, ajoutant qu’à son arrivée au pouvoir, le Tchad ‘’était divisé en 11 tendances’’.

‘’Chaque tendance avait son territoire, son Etat, son armée et son administration. […] Dans un pays comme ça, en proie à la guerre, forcément tout le monde n’est pas saint dans l’armée, dans la police et dans la gendarmerie’’, a fait valoir Hissène Habré.

‘’On veut rendre justice au Tchad et aux Tchadiens, n’est-ce pas ? Je suis totalement consentant. Je suis totalement d’accord qu’on organise une justice internationale indépendante, selon les normes du droit’’, a-t-il encore dit.

‘’Que tous les Tchadiens à qui on reproche quelque chose viennent se présenter devant cette juridiction. Y compris Hissène Habré, y compris les anciens présidents du Tchad’’, a-t-il soutenu. ‘’Pourquoi je dois être le seul à être jugé ?’’

Il est accusé de plusieurs milliers d’assassinats politiques et de torture systématique pendant les huit années de sa présidence (1982 à 1990), des violations qualifiées de crimes contre l’humanité et de crimes de guerre.

BK/OID
http://www.youtube-nocookie.com/v/4NlbKTuBGgg?version=3&hl=en_US&rel=0


(…) if you kill 40, 000 people, you get a comfortable exile with a bank account in another country (…)

December 27, 2011

Reed Brody, HRW

“If you kill one person, you go to jail. If you kill 40 people, they put you in an insane asylum. But if you kill 40, 000 people, you get a comfortable exile with a bank account in another country, and that’s what we want to change here,”
Reed Brody, Human Rights Watch


“Impunity is a cancer that prevents us from realizing our true potential” [1]

December 6, 2011
Jacqueline Moudeina, a leader in the fight to bring former Chadian dictator Hissène Habré to justice receives Right Livelihood Award

Jacqueline Moudeina, a leader in the fight to bring former Chadian dictator Hissène Habré to justice receives Right Livelihood Award

Jacqueline Moudeina is president of the Chadian Association for the Promotion and Defense of Human Rights (ATPDH) and has been the lawyer for the victims of the former dictator Hissène Habré since 2000. In 2001, Ms. Moudeina was seriously injured by a grenade thrown by security forces commanded by a former officer in Hissène Habré’s political police.
On December 5, 2011, Ms. Moudeina received the Right Livelihood Award 2011, which is considered to be the “Alternative Nobel Prize,” “for her tireless efforts at great personal risk to win justice for the victims of the former dictatorship in Chad and to increase awareness and observance of human rights in Africa” (http://www.rightlivelihood.org [4]).

This is her acceptance speech delivered at the Swedish parliament in Stockholm on December 5, 2011.

*****

Jacqueline Moudeina’s Remarks for the “Right Livelihood Award”

Honorable Ladies and Gentlemen,

Allow me to begin by sincerely thanking you for the distinguished honor that you are bestowing upon me through the “Right Livelihood Award.” This award recognizes me specifically but, beyond that, rewards all the human rights defenders in the world, and particularly in Africa.

Rest assured that it is a deeply encouraging sign for us, the human rights defenders, and especially for us, the women, who fight on a daily basis, in very difficult conditions, sometimes at the risk of our own lives, in a world where power is generally held by men. This award gives us the courage to continue our different struggles on a road fraught with pitfalls.

Fighting for victims is in my genes. I am a rebel who from an early age has been indignant in the face of abuse, and I cannot bear injustice. I have always felt this way and always will, as long as those who suffer injustice are ignored by their leaders and as long as justice is selective. Many have tried to prevent me from doing my work; many have tried to intimidate me, to psychologically and physically threaten me. But I have come to understand, as Alexis Voinov said in Albert Camus’ The Just Assassins, that “it isnot enough to speak out against injustice. You have to dedicate your life to fighting it.” Until now, no one has managed to discourage me or get the better of me. I will continue my fight.

Ladies and Gentlemen,

I will seize this occasion to tell you about one aspect of our struggle for human rights: the fight against impunity.

In the past twenty years, the international community has undeniably made major strides in the fight against impunity for the worst criminals. But in Africa, much remains to be done. On this continent, impunity is a cancer that, with its corollary disease corruption, has infected our body politic and prevents us from realizing our true potential. We, the members of civil society, are fighting against this cancer, from Tunis to Harare, from Dakar to Khartoum, and in other places like Abidjan, Tripoli, and N’Djamena.

And yet, this justice that I am speaking about is not a science in the making. It isn’t a utopia. It is the most fundamental form of justice: criminal justice that allows victims to wash away the worst horrors, that gives back dignity to men who were tortured, and that gives back courage to women who have lost hope.

You only need to look at our struggle to bring to justice the former dictator of my country, Hissène Habré, to understand that today, in the twenty-first century, more than sixty years after the Nuremberg trials, it is sometimes easier to resort to oppression than to abide by the law, easier to commit violence than to deliver justice!

Habré ruled Chad from 1982 to 1990 until his overthrow and exile in Senegal. During his reign, atrocities were committed on a large scale, waves of ethnic cleansing crashed down on individual groups, and torture was institutionalized. In 1992, a national Commission of Inquiry estimated that his regime was responsible for the death of more than 40,000 people and the disappearance of thousands of individuals, leaving in its wake innumerable widows and orphans.

The victims of the Habré regime, whom I represent, have fought tirelessly for justice for twenty-one years. But to date their struggle remains unfinished. Before leaving power, Hissène Habré emptied out Chad’s national coffers and has skillfully used these funds in Senegal to weave himself a powerful network of protection. And so, instead of allowing the victims’ case to be heard, Senegal and the African Union have subjected them to what Archbishop Desmond Tutu and 117 organizations from twenty-five African countries rightly denounced as an “interminable political and legal soap opera.” I would say even more: a true stations of the cross for the victims.

In January 2000, we filed a complaint against Hissène Habré in Senegal where he now lives. One month later, the decision by a Senegalese judge to indict Habré gave us real hope.

However, following political inference, denounced by the United Nations, the Senegalese courts declared that they lacked jurisdiction.

The victims then turned toward Belgium which offered them a path to justice. After a four-year investigation, a Belgian judge issued an international arrest warrant against Habré in 2005. The victims once again felt real hope that they might see Hissène Habré brought to justice for his alleged crimes.

But once again, the victims were disappointed when Senegal refused to extradite Habré to Belgium.

In May 2006, the UN Committee against Torture condemned Senegal for its failure to act and enjoined Senegal to prosecute or extradite the former Chadian dictator.

In July 2006, the heads of state and government leaders of the African Union gave Senegal a mandate to prosecute Habré “in the name of Africa.” It was another step forward.

But our renewed hope to see Habré tried was short-lived. For four years, Senegal conditioned the start of investigations on the up-front payment by the international community of all the costs of the trial. When the international community committed to such payment, President Abdoulaye Wade of Senegal suddenly refused to execute the mandate conferred by the African Union and, in June 2011, finally declared that Senegal would not prosecute Hissène Habré.

Since then, Belgium, a country to which I express thanks on behalf of all the victims, has renewed its extradition request.

But now, the African Union now talks of sending Habré to Rwanda and starting everything all over again. What an outrage! What a loss of time, when the surviving victims are dying one after the other! More than a dozen victims have passed away this year alone. A request to transfer Habré to Rwanda would entail many more years of waiting, the time that it would take for Rwanda to create an adequate legislative framework, to conduct an investigation, and to issue an extradition request, whereas a trial in Belgium could take place quickly.

This is yet another dilatory tactic by the African Union, and calls into question the institution’s commitment to the fight against impunity. With a few exceptions, African leaders, who say that they want to free themselves of the tutelage of international tribunals and the extradition requests of Western countries, are revealing that they form nothing more than a club of heads of states ensuring their own impunity.

It is time for Senegal to grant victims the justice that they have demanded by extraditing Habré to Belgium where he can be tried. The victims cannot wait any longer. Psychologically and physically, they have suffered severe trauma that has taken a heavy toll over the years.

The Chadian government itself, last July, requested, and I quote, that the “option to extradite Habré to Belgium to face trial be given priority.” Why is President Wade denying us justice? Why is the African Union failing to listen to the victims? Why do Senegal and the African Union not support the position of Chad, the country most directly concerned by this case, which is to see Habré tried in Belgium?

I would like to seize this opportunity today to voice the victims’ plea, and to call on Senegal to extradite Habré to Belgium, to enable them at last to obtain justice.

This case isn’t just about one man, however, but rather it is about one of the most tyrannical regimes of the last century.This regime is usually identified with one man, Habré, but we have not forgotten about his accomplices, the executioners and torturers who carried out the former dictator’s orders. These ex-agents of Habré’s terrifying political police, known as the “Documentation and Security Directorate,” must also face justice before the Chadian courts and must be removed from public service. This was already one of the main recommendations of the National Commission of Inquiry in 1992.

Some of these accomplices continue to haunt us by taunting and threatening us in our daily lives. But we will not drop this fight. I myself was targeted in 2001 for my involvement in the Habré case. During a peaceful march in favor of democracy, a police squad attempted to assassinate me with a grenade. Its commander was none other than a former torturer against whom the victims had initiated a judicial procedure in Chad.

This event illustrates the educational value of a trial: how could this former torturer still believe that a dictator’s weapon is more powerful than a judge’s gavel? Despite this attempted assassination, I have never relented, and I will continue my efforts until Habré and the other executioners are brought to justice.

Ladies and Gentlemen,

The challenge of our struggle, above and beyond the trial of one individual, is that of national union for a lasting peace in my country. Today, the trial of Hissène Habré and his accomplices would allow the Chadian people to begin, at last, the reconstruction of their country. And it is only at the end of this process that the Chadian people will be able to truly come together and enjoy a rebirth.

In the struggle to end the impunity of some powerful leaders, justice has so far been an elusive dream. But this award which you bestow on me today is a tribute to the thousands of victims, widows, and orphans.

And it is to these individuals that I dedicate this award. We will not give up.This award reaffirms that we are right and encourages us to continue our fight against impunity.

Thank you for your attention.

Source URL: http://www.hrw.org/news/2011/12/06/impunity-cancer-prevents-us-realizing-our-true-potential
Links:
[1] http://www.hrw.org/news/2011/12/06/impunity-cancer-prevents-us-realizing-our-true-potential
[2] http://twitter.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.hrw.org%2Fnews%2F2011%2F12%2F06%2Fimpunity-cancer-prevents-us-realizing-our-true-potential&count=horizontal&via=&text=%E2%80%9CImpunity%20is%20a%20cancer%20that%20prevents%20us%20from%20realizing%20our%20true%20potential%E2%80%9D&counturl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.hrw.org%2Fnews%2F2011%2F12%2F06%2Fimpunity-cancer-prevents-us-realizing-our-true-potential
[3] http://www.facebook.com/plugins/like.php?href=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.hrw.org%2Fnews%2F2011%2F12%2F06%2Fimpunity-cancer-prevents-us-realizing-our-true-potential&layout=button_count&show_faces=false&action=recommend&colorscheme=light&width=100&height=21&font=&locale=
[4] http://www.rightlivelihood.org


Statement of the Steering Committee of the International Committee for the Fair Trial of Hissène Habré

October 27, 2011

Hissène Habré Case: A Real Solution Or More Dilatory Tactics?

The victims of the former Chadian dictator Hissène Habré have been fighting for more than 20 years to bring him to justice in a fair trial so that he can answer for the crimes committed by his government from 1982 to 1990.

Despite our efforts, the time has come to face the fact that the justice tirelessly sought by the victims has not been forthcoming. We have been subjected since 1990 to what Archbishop Desmond Tutu and 117 groups from 25 African countries denounced in July 2010 as an “interminable political and legal soap opera.”

On July 22, 2011, the Chadian government took the responsible decision to ask Senegal to extradite Habré to Belgium, which had sought his extradition in 2005 after Senegal courts ruled that they could not try him. A new Belgian extradition request submitted in September is pending before the Senegalese courts.

Faced with Senegal’s clear and repeated lack of will to prosecute Habré, we consider that extraditing him to Belgium is the most practical and timely option to ensure that he can respond to the charges against him with all the guarantees of a fair trial. Belgium is the only country that has received and listened to the victims and that continues to offer them a path toward justice.

In Belgium, a trial could be organized quickly, which is essential given that many survivors have already died. The victims of Habré’s crimes should be able to testify about their experience and to participate actively in his trial.

A Belgian investigating judge, with the assistance of police detectives specialized in the prosecution of crimes against humanity, examined the charges for four years. The team visited Chad in 2002, interrogating Habré’s former accomplices and visiting detention centers and former mass graves. It seized and analyzed copies of thousands of documents of Habré’s political police (the “DDS”), which revealed the identity of 1,208 people who died in detention and 12,321 victims of torture or other human rights violations. This strong evidence allowed the Belgian judge to indict Habré on charges of crimes against humanity, war crimes, and torture, and allowed Belgium to request his extradition.

In addition to the time factor, Belgium offers the conditions for holding an exemplary trial:

An independent judicial system;
Respect for fair trial rights;
The capacity to investigate and try a complex case involving mass crimes committed more than 20 years ago in a foreign country, largely due to its experience in similar cases;
A civil party (partie civile) system, which allows victims to participate fully in the trial;
Use of the French language, which is spoken by the accused and most of the victims;
An environment conducive to raising public awareness around a trial that will take place far away from Chad, including freedom of expression and the ability to make video and audio recordings of the court proceedings to be transmitted in Chad; and
Free access to the trial for non-governmental organizations and journalists who can monitor proceedings and encourage public debate.

We take note of the willingness and availability of Rwanda to organize this trial, in response to an inquiry by the African Union. The offer brings honor to Rwanda, which has also suffered from atrocities committed on its territory and which therefore understands the stakes and the need for justice for the victims to foster national reconciliation.

However, we wonder whether this option, put forward by the AU, is yet another dilatory tactic which calls into question its efforts to see Habré tried according to the strict dictates of the law. The law offers a clear response to Senegal’s refusal, for more than five years, to discharge the mandate of the African Union: the extradition of Habré to Belgium.

Moreover, we are particularly concerned that additional years might be needed for Rwanda to enact a legal framework allowing its courts to prosecute crimes that have no direct link to the country, to secure financing for the trial, to restart a complex transnational investigation, and to request Habré’s extradition. Many more survivors would be likely to die during those years.

We both understand and share the desire to see Habré tried in Africa. More than anyone, we have relentlessly attempted to bring about such a trial for years. We filed a complaint against Habré in Senegal in 2000. We presented to Senegalese judicial authorities hundreds of witness statements gathered in Chad and an analysis of the thousands of documents uncovered at the DDS headquarters that reveal in detail the scope of the crimes committed. And, between 2007 and 2010, we mobilized the international community to finance Habré’s trial in Senegal.

Today the most realistic option to avoid impunity for the mass crimes allegedly committed by Hissène Habré, and the option supported by Chad, is to extradite him for trial to Belgium. We call on the international community, and in particular the African Union, to support this option so that the victims can finally obtain justice.

The Steering Committee:
The Association of Victims of the Crimes of Hissène Habré (AVCRHH)
The Chadian Association for the Promotion and Defense of Human Rights (ATPDH)
The African Assembly for the Defense of Human Rights (RADDHO)
Human Rights Watch
The International Federation of Human Rights (FIDH)


Right Livelihood Award: Standing up for Victims of Chad’s Ex-Dictator

September 30, 2011

Jacqueline Moudeïna, Lawyer for Habré’s Victims, Gets ‘Alternative Nobel Prize’

(New York) – The decision to give the Right Livelihood Award to Jacqueline Moudeïna, the lawyer for the victims of the exiled former dictator of Chad, Hissène Habré, highlights the victims’ 20-year quest to bring Habré to justice, Human Rights Watch said today.

The award, announced on September 29, 2011, in Stockholm, cited Moudeïna, “for her tireless efforts at great personal risk to win justice for the victims of the former dictatorship in Chad and to increase awareness and observance of human rights in Africa.” The award, presented annually in the Swedish parliament, is widely known as the “Alternative Nobel Prize.” It is the first time that a Right Livelihood Award goes to a Chadian. The other three laureates in 2011 are Huang Ming (China), Ina May Gaskin (USA) and the international organization GRAIN.

“Jacky Moudeïna has risked everything, including her life, to bring Hissène Habré to justice,” said Reed Brody, counsel and spokesperson for Human Rights Watch. “This award shines a spotlight on Senegal’s refusal, after 20 long years, to give Habré’s victims their day in court.”

In July 2010, Archbishop Desmond Tutu and 117 groups from 25 African countries denounced the “interminable political and legal soap opera” to which Habré’s victims had been subjected over 20 years.

Habré ruled Chad from 1982 until he was deposed in 1990 by the current president, Idriss Déby Itno, and fled to Senegal. Habré’s one-party rule was marked by widespread atrocities, including waves of ethnic violence.  Files of Habré’s political police, the DDS, which were discoveredby Human Rights Watch, reveal the names of 1,208 people who were killed or died in detention and 12,321 victims of human rights violations.

Habré was first indicted in Senegal in 2000, but its courts ruled that he could not be tried there.  His victims then filed a case in Belgium. After years of investigation, a Belgian judge in September 2005 issued an international arrest warrant against Habré, and Belgium requested his extradition. Senegal asked the African Union to recommend a course of action and in July 2006, the African Union called on Senegal to prosecute Habré “on behalf of Africa.” Years of stalling ensued, however, even after international donors fully funded the US$11.9 million trial budget in November 2010.

In May 2011, Senegal walked out of talks with the AU over the trial and made clear that it would not prosecute Habré in Senegal. On July 10, President Abdoulaye Wade of Senegal reversed a decision announced two days earlier to expel Habré to Chad, where he has been sentenced to death in absentia. Belgium made a second extradition request, which is pending.

In addition to the cases against Habré, Moudeïna took an enormous personal risk by filing criminal complaints in Chad itself against a number of Habré’s accomplices, including the heads of the DDS, many of whom are still in positions of power in Chad. In June 2001, a security squad, led by Mahamat Wakayé, one of the men she is suing, threw a grenade at her while she was participating in a peaceful demonstration in N’Djaména, the Chadian capital. Moudeïna was severely injured from the shrapnel and still walks with difficulty ten years later.

“Jacky Moudeïna’s work is a direct challenge to the continuing power of those who terrorized Chad in the Habré years,” Brody said. “Her determination to stand up for torture victims at great personal sacrifice is a shining example to us all.”


Senegal: Accept AU Plan for Hissène Habré Case

March 22, 2011

African Union Proposed Special Court for Long-Awaited Trial of Chad’s Ex-Dictator
March 22, 2011
(Dakar) – Senegal should accept an African Union (AU) plan for the trial of Hissène Habré during discussions set for March 23 and 24, 2011, in Addis Ababa, a coalition of human rights organizations said today in a letter to Senegal’s president.

The African Union, which called at its summit in January for an “expeditious” start to a long-delayed trial, invited Senegal to the Ethiopian capital to discuss an AU proposal to try the former Chadian dictator before a special court within the Senegalese justice system whose president and appeals chamber president would be appointed by the AU.  The Senegalese delegation to the talks will be led by Justice Minister Cheikh Tidiane Sy.

Habré is accused of thousands of political killings and systematic torture when he ruled Chad, from 1982 to 1990, before fleeing to Senegal. Senegal has raised one objection after another to bringing him to trial, while refusing to send him to Belgium, which sought his extradition in 2005.

“Senegal has two choices,” said Assane Dioma Ndiaye, Président of the Senegalese League for Human Rights. “Either it accepts the African Union plan and begins proceedings against Habré right away, or it extradites Habré to Belgium. It would be a shame if Africa could not meet this challenge when everything is set for an African country to provide a fair trial for any crimes committed in Africa.”

President Abdoulaye Wade of Senegal said recently that he was “returning” the case to the AU, and Foreign Minister Madické Niang has called for the establishment of an international tribunal to prosecute Habré.

The letter to President Wade was signed by  the Association of Victims of Hissène Habré’s Regime, the Senegalese League for Human Rights, the African Assembly for the Defense of Human Rights, Acting Together for Human Rights (Agir Ensemble pour les Droits de l’Homme), and Human Rights Watch. The letter warned that it would be impossible to finance  an international tribunal,and that any attempt to create an ad hoc tribunal along the Sierra Leone or Rwanda models, or to add  significant international staff to the AU proposal, would be seen as a way of ” burying the case.”

Last Friday, the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights Navi Pillay, also told President Wade that the Habré trial should begin “as soon as possible,” and that if Senegal could not begin the case quickly, it should extradite Habré to Belgium.

Background
Habré ruled Chad from 1982 until he was deposed in 1990 by President Idriss Déby Itno and fled to Senegal. His one-party regime was marked by widespread atrocities, including waves of campaigns against various ethnic groups.  Files of Habré’s political police, the Documentation and Security Board (Direction de la Documentation et de la Sécurité, DDS), which were discovered by Human Rights Watch in 2001, reveal the names of 1,208 people who were killed or died in detention. A total of 12,321 victims of human rights violations were mentioned in the files.

Habre was first indicted in Senegal in 2000, but then Senegalese courts ruled that he could not be tried there. His victims then turned to Belgium, and after a four-year investigation, a Belgian judge in September 2005 issued an arrest warrant charging Habré with crimes against humanity, war crimes, and torture, and requested his extradition.

Senegal then asked the African Union to recommend a course of action. On July 2, 2006, the AU called on Senegal to prosecute Habré. Wade accepted, but refused to proceed for several years, until Senegal was provided with money to finance the trial. On November 24, 2010, international donors met in Dakar and agreed to fund the US$11.7 million budget for the trial.

Before the donors’ meeting, the Court of Justice of the Economic Community of West African States said that Habré’s trial should be carried out by “a special ad hoc procedure of an international character.” That decision has been severely criticized by the Journal of International Criminal Justice, the American Society of International Law , and the President of the Irish Section of the  International Law Association.

The AU responded to that decision by proposing the creation of a special court within the Senegalese justice system with the presidents of the trial court and the appeals court appointed by the AU.  The court would prosecute the person or persons “who bear the greatest responsibility” for genocide, crimes against humanity, war crimes, and torture committed in Chad from June 1982 to December 1990.

In July 2010, Archbishop Desmond Tutu and 117 groups from 25 African countries denounced the “interminable political and legal soap opera” to which the victims had been subjected over 20 years.


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 36 other followers