Opponents want Chad dictator tried in Belgium

March 11, 2012

By MIKE CORDER, Associated Press – 3 hours ago

THE HAGUE, Netherlands (AP) — Souleymane Guengueng still doesn’t like talking about his nearly three years as a political prisoner of former Chad dictator Hissene Habre, but he recalls having to rest his head on the corpses of fellow detainees in his crowded cell.

The haunting memories drove him to form an association of victims of one of Africa’s most brutal dictatorships and he is now hoping a case at the United Nations’ highest court will bring Habre a step closer to prosecution.

Hearings start Monday at the International Court of Justice in a case that boils down to Belgium seeking an order for Senegal to prosecute or extradite Habre.

Habre, 69, has lived in a villa in Senegal’s capital, Dakar, since rebels ousted him in 1990 after a ruthless eight-year reign.

Senegal has pledged for years to bring him to justice, but survivors long ago lost faith that authorities have the political will to put Habre on trial and are instead pinning their hopes on Belgium, which indicted him in 2005 for crimes against humanity, war crimes and torture.

A Chadian commission of inquiry concluded Habre’s regime killed tens of thousands of political opponents. A court in Chad has convicted him in absentia of crimes against the state and sentenced him to death.

According to a Human Rights Watch report, Habre seized power in 1982, in part thanks to U.S. support, because he opposed Libyan leader Moammar Gadhafi’s attempts to influence Chad. He swiftly established a brutal dictatorship to stamp out any opposition, but was finally toppled by current Chad President Idriss Deby in 1990.

“Under Habre, a wife was afraid of her husband and vice versa and they were both afraid of their children,” said lawyer Jacqueline Moudeina, who represents survivors of Habre’s regime. “Chadians were afraid of their own shadow.”

Survivors of the state-sponsored brutality are now hoping the world court will order Senegal to extradite Habre to Belgium.

Belgium indicted Habre under universal jurisdiction, a legal doctrine which effectively says that some crimes are so heinous they can be prosecuted anywhere.

The court is likely to take months to deliver its ruling.

Habre’s Senegal-based lawyer El Hadj Diouf has called the international court case a “new kind of judicial imperialism” and said Belgium should give Senegal the chance to try Habre.

But activists say Senegal has had more than enough time and now the world court should turn over the case to Belgium.

“For us, the case is … what we would call in America a slam dunk,” said Reed Brody, a Human Rights Watch activist who has long fought for justice for Habre’s victims. “Senegal has an obligation to prosecute or extradite. It has been 21 years and they have not done it.”

Speaking to reporters in The Hague, Moudeina said time is running out, with survivors growing old and dying as they wait for justice. She said 11 members of a victims’ organization died last year.

Guengueng says he was arrested while working in Cameroon for an organization called the Lake Chad Basin Commission. He was considered anti-Habre because many rebels also were based in Cameroon at the time, he said.

He was finally freed when Habre was ousted — after almost three years in overcrowded cells in which prisoners sometimes died and their bodies were not immediately removed. He still wears glasses after being imprisoned for long periods in total darkness, followed by long periods of bright light, he said.

“As victims, our only hope and desire is to see Hissene Habre extradited to Belgium so we can learn the truth,” he said. “That would be … a kind of cure for victims who are still alive today.”


Belgium/Senegal: World Court Should Order Habré Extradition [1]

March 8, 2012
Senegal Refuses to Prosecute Chad’s ex-Dictator; Trial Should Move to Belgium
(The Hague) – The International Court of Justice (ICJ) should order Senegal to extradite the former Chadian dictator Hissène Habré to Belgium, Human Rights Watch and Chadian victims groups said today.
Hearings on Belgium’s application for an order requesting Senegal to move forward with Habré’s prosecution or extradition are scheduled to begin at the court on March 12 [4], 2012.

“The Senegalese government has made it quite clear that it will not prosecute Habré,” said Souleymane Guengueng [5], who nearly died during almost three years of mistreatment in Habré’s prisons before founding an association of victims to seek justice. “The International Court of Justice should order Senegal to send Habré to Belgium so we can finally have our day in court before all the survivors pass away.”

Habré, 69, who has been living in Senegal for 21 years, is wanted by Belgium on charges of crimes against humanity, war crimes, and torture committed during his rule, from 1982 to 1990. Belgium recently [6] filed its fourth request seeking Habré’s extradition after Senegal rebuffed the first three, part of what Nobel Peace Prize winner Bishop Desmond Tutu has described as an interminable political and legal soap opera [7] for the victims.

Under the UN Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment [8], Senegal must either prosecute or extradite Habré. In papers filed with the International Court of Justice, Senegal contends that it still intends to prosecute Habré. Senegalese officials, however, including President Abdoulaye Wade, have on numerous occasions publicly ruled out [9] putting Habré on trial.

During 2011, Senegal’s foreign minister, Madické Niang, said time [10] and again [11] that Habré would not be tried in Senegal. In July, Wade announced that he was expelling Habré to Chad – where he has already been condemned to death in absentia for unrelated crimes – only to retract that decision in face of an international outcry. In announcing the retraction, Senegal’s foreign minister again ruled out holding Habré’s trial in Senegal [12].

The government of Chad also announced in July [13] that it was in favor of extraditing Habré to Belgium. In 2002, the Chadian government waived Habré’s immunity [14] so he could be prosecuted in Belgium.

Habré was first indicted [15] in Senegal in 2000, but after political interference by the Senegalese government, Senegalese courts held [16] that they had no jurisdiction to prosecute Habré for extraterritorial crimes. They said Senegal had not incorporated provisions of the Torture Convention [8] requiring states to establish their jurisdiction over acts of torture committed abroad when the alleged perpetrator is in their territory. The decision and the surrounding political interference were denounced by UN rapporteurs on torture and judicial independence [17].

Other victims of Habré, including several Belgian citizens, then filed a case against Habré in Belgium. After four years of investigation, a Belgian judge in September 2005 requested Habré’s extradition. A Senegalese court ruled [18] that it lacked jurisdiction to decide on the extradition request, however.

Senegal then asked the African Union “to indicate the jurisdiction which is competent to try this matter [19].” When the African Union called on Senegal to prosecute Habré “on behalf of Africa [20],” Wade accepted. The next four years were taken up with wrangling over the trial budget and framework.

As negotiations dragged on, and after Wade threatened to let Habréleave Senegal, Belgium filed suit [21] against Senegal at the ICJ in February 2009. In May 2009, in response to a request from Belgium for the indication of provisional measures, Senegal formally pledged [22] not to allow Habré to leave Senegal pending the ICJ’s final judgment.

In November 2010, the Court of Justice of the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) held [23] that Habré’s trial should be carried out by “a special ad hoc procedure of an international character.” Later that month, nations coming together at a Donors Round-Table [24] fully funded the projected trial budget while the African Union responded to the ECOWAS court decision by proposing a special court [25] within the Senegalese justice system with some judges appointed by the African Union. In May 2011, however, Senegal withdrew from negotiations with the African Union [26] over creation of the court.

Since then, a Senegalese appeals court has refused to rule on two more Belgian extradition requests because it concluded that the legal papers were not in order. In both cases, the Senegalese government apparently did not transmit [27] the Belgian legal papers intact to the court.

“The Senegalese government has given the victims the run-around for 21 years, and is now trying to pull the wool over the ICJ’s eyes,” said Jacqueline Moudeïna [28], lawyer for the victims and president of the Chadian Association for the Promotion of Human Rights. “The ICJ should call a halt to Senegal’s shenanigans.”

The ICJ, which sits in The Hague, is the United Nations’ highest court. The court deals generally with cases between UN member states and it has no jurisdiction to prosecute individuals. Its rulings can be legally binding on states.

Belgium’s application charges that Senegal has violated the Torture Convention [8] and its obligations under customary international law by failing to prosecute or extradite Habré.

In May 2006, the United Nations Committee against Torture found [29] that Senegal had violated the Torture Convention and called on Senegal to prosecute or extradite Habré. In July 2011, Navi Pillay, the UN high commissioner for human rights, reminded [30] the Senegalese government that “[i]t is a violation of international law to shelter a person who has committed torture or other crimes against humanity, without prosecuting or extraditing him.” In November 2011, the Committee against Torture’s rapporteur again reminded [31] Senegal of its obligations.

In July 2011, the Chadian government complained [13] that “[w]hile some victims have died and others wait for over two decades for justice, Hissène Habré, accused of extremely serious crimes, continues to enjoy his comfortable exile in Dakar, Senegal.”

The public hearings at the ICJ will extend until March 21. A ruling is not expected for a few months.

Habré ruled Chad from 1982 until he was deposed in 1990 by President Idriss Déby Itno and fled to Senegal. His one-party regime was marked by widespread atrocities, including waves of ethnic campaigns and systematic torture. Files of Habré’s political police [32], the Direction de la Documentation et de la Sécurité (DDS), which were discovered [33] by Human Rights Watch in 2001, reveal [34] the names of 1,208 people who were killed or died in detention and 12,321 victims of different human rights violations.


Source URL: http://www.hrw.org/news/2012/03/08/belgiumsenegal-world-court-should-order-habr-extradition

Links:
[1] http://www.hrw.org/news/2012/03/08/belgiumsenegal-world-court-should-order-habr-extradition
[2] http://twitter.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.hrw.org%2Fnews%2F2012%2F03%2F08%2Fbelgiumsenegal-world-court-should-order-habr-extradition&count=horizontal&via=&text=Belgium%2FSenegal%3A%20World%20Court%20Should%20Order%20Habr%C3%A9%20Extradition&counturl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.hrw.org%2Fnews%2F2012%2F03%2F08%2Fbelgiumsenegal-world-court-should-order-habr-extradition
[3] http://www.facebook.com/plugins/like.php?href=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.hrw.org%2Fnews%2F2012%2F03%2F08%2Fbelgiumsenegal-world-court-should-order-habr-extradition&layout=button_count&show_faces=false&action=recommend&colorscheme=light&width=100&height=21&font=&locale=
[4] http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/files/144/16925.pdf
[5] http://www.nytimes.com/2001/03/31/world/he-bore-up-under-torture-now-he-bears-witness.html?pagewanted=all&src=pm
[6] http://appablog.wordpress.com/2012/01/18/transmission-dune-quatrieme-demande-dextradition-par-la-belgique-au-senegal-a-lencontre-de-m-hissene-habre/
[7] http://www.hrw.org/news/2010/07/20/senegalchad-nobel-winners-african-activists-seek-progress-habr-trial
[8] http://www2.ohchr.org/english/law/cat.htm
[9] http://www.seneweb.com/news/Afrique/abdoulaye-wade-se-declare-dessaisi-du-proces-de-hissene-habre_n_40995.html
[10] http://video.senego.com/la-declaration-de-madicke-niang/sur-la-suspension-de-la-mesure-dextradition-de-hissene-habre-video_0e5c0c6a8.html
[11] http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kbnjZttnsfQ
[12] http://www.rfi.fr/afrique/20110710-dakar-suspend-expulsion-ex-president-tchadien-hissene-habre
[13] http://www.infotchad.com/details.asp?item_id=2838
[14] http://www.hrw.org/legacy/french/press/2002/tchad1205a.htm
[15] http://www.hrw.org/legacy/french/themes/habre-inculpation.html
[16] http://www.haguejusticeportal.net/Docs/NLP/Senegal/Habr%E9_Cour_Cassation_Arr%EAt_20-3-2001.pdf
[17] http://www.unhchr.ch/huricane/huricane.nsf/0/6D27DFAAD462DFFFC12569310029C2C4?opendocument
[18] http://www.hrw.org/legacy/french/docs/2005/11/26/chad12091.htm
[19] http://www.hrw.org/fr/news/2005/11/26/communiqu-du-minist-re-des-affaires-trang-res-27-novembre-2005
[20] http://www.hrw.org/en/news/2006/01/24/declaration-hiss-ne-habr-case-and-african-union
[21] http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/files/144/15054.pdf
[22] http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/files/144/15149.pdf
[23] http://www.hrw.org/fr/news/2010/11/18/arr-t-cedeaoecowas-ruling-hissein-habr-c-r-publique-du-s-n-gal
[24] http://www.hrw.org/sites/default/files/related_material/Table%20ronde%20donateurs%20document%20final.pdf
[25] http://www.hrw.org/news/2011/03/22/senegal-accept-au-plan-hiss-ne-habr-case
[26] http://www.hrw.org/news/2011/06/09/senegal-habr-trial-illusion
[27] http://www.hrw.org/news/2012/01/12/senegal-stop-stalling-habr-extradition
[28] http://www.hrw.org/news/2011/09/30/right-livelihood-award-standing-victims-chad-s-ex-dictator
[29] http://www.unhchr.ch/tbs/doc.nsf/%28Symbol%29/aafdd8e81a424894c125718c004490f6?Opendocument
[30] http://www.ohchr.org/EN/NewsEvents/Pages/DisplayNews.aspx?NewsID=11233&LangID=E
[31] http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=296405470393182&set=a.153452781355119.27833.106827982684266&type=1&theater
[32] http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2010/03/08/inside_a_dictators_secret_police
[33] http://www.hrw.org/legacy/justice/habre/habre-police.htm
[34] https://www.hrdag.org/about/downloads/State-Violence-in-Chad.pdf


Senegal will lose US aid if fails to extradite Habre: NGO

January 11, 2012
Senegalese President Abdoulaye Wade

Senegalese President Abdoulaye Wade

Senegal risks losing up to $50 million in US aid if it fails to bring former Chadian dictator Hissene Habre to justice, a regional rights group warned Wednesday.

“More than 25 billion CFA francs risk being completely jeopardised by Senegal’s inability to comply with its international obligations and try or extradite Hissene Habre,” RADDHO said in a statement.

The Dakar-based African Assembly for the Defence of Human Rights said said that while Washington had earmarked the amount for Senegal, some US representatives had voiced concern over the lack of progress in the Habre case.

Habre, dubbed Africa’s Pinochet for atrocities committed under his rule, has been living in Senegal since fleeing his country in 1990 after being ousted by President Idriss Deby Itno. He had ruled for eight years.

A 1992 truth commission report in Chad said that during his time in power, Habre presided over up to 40,000 political murders and widespread torture.

While mandated by the African Union to put Habre on trial, Senegal has dragged its feet for years.

Last year, Senegalese President Abdoulaye Wade announced he would send Habre back to Chad but backed down at the last minute under pressure from rights groups and the United Nations.

The 85-year-old Wade, who is controversially seeking another term in office in an election next month, said earlier this month in an interview that Habre’s extradition to Belgium was imminent.

“Very probably, Hissene Habre will be sent to Belgium. I have referred Belgium’s request to the Dakar court of appeal. If the court decides it, he will be extradited,” he said.

Belgium has wanted to try Habre since 2005, when it issued an international arrest warrant for “serious violations of international humanitarian law”.


Senegal rejects extradition of Chad’s Habre to Belgium

January 11, 2012
Senegal rejects extradition of Chad's Habre to Belgium

Senegal rejects extradition of Chad's Habre to Belgium

(AFP) – DAKAR — Senegal’s appeals court on Wednesday rejected a Belgian request for Chad’s former president Hissene Habre to be extradited to face charges of atrocities committed during his 1982-1990 rule.

“The Dakar Appeals Court today rejected the request to have Hissene Habre extradited to Belgium. It ruled that Belgium’s demand did not conform to legal provisions” in Senegal, said an official from the justice ministry.

“Belgium did not respect the procedure,” he said, without giving details.

Belgium had proposed in July that Habre be extradited, with support from the Chadian government.

Reed Brody, a lawyer with Human Rights Watch who has spearheaded the case against Habre, said the ruling was not definitive.

“They did not refuse extradition, they said Belgium had not annexed the original arrest warrant and other papers” only photocopied versions, he told AFP by telephone from Belgium.

“It is purely a technical ruling. It leaves the door open to a fresh Belgian extradition request… it is not a definitive ruling on the merits of the case.”

Brody was part of a Belgian investigating team that visited Chad in 2002, where they visited detention centres and mass graves and found thousands of documents from Habre’s political police, providing strong evidence of torture and rights violations.

Habre, dubbed Africa’s Pinochet for atrocities committed under his rule, has been living in Senegal since fleeing his country in 1990 after being ousted by President Idriss Deby Itno. He had ruled for eight years.

A 1992 truth commission report in Chad said that during his time in power, Habre presided over up to 40,000 political murders and widespread torture.

While mandated by the African Union to put Habre on trial, Senegal has dragged its feet for years.

Last year, Senegalese President Abdoulaye Wade announced he would send Habre back to Chad but backed down at the last minute under pressure from rights groups and the United Nations.

The 85-year-old Wade, who is controversially seeking another term in office in an election next month, said earlier this month in an interview that Habre’s extradition to Belgium was imminent.

“Very probably, Hissene Habre will be sent to Belgium. I have referred Belgium’s request to the Dakar court of appeal. If the court decides it, he will be extradited,” he said.

Belgium has wanted to try Habre since 2005, when it issued an international arrest warrant for “serious violations of international humanitarian law”.

The Dakar-based African Assembly for the Defence of Human Rights warned that Senegal risks losing up to $50 million (39 million euros) in US aid if it fails to bring Habre to justice.

“More than 25 billion CFA francs risk being completely jeopardised by Senegal’s inability to comply with its international obligations and try or extradite Hissene Habre,” RADDHO said in a statement.

The rights body said that while Washington had earmarked the amount for Senegal, some US representatives had voiced concern over the lack of progress in the Habre case.


“Impunity is a cancer that prevents us from realizing our true potential” [1]

December 6, 2011
Jacqueline Moudeina, a leader in the fight to bring former Chadian dictator Hissène Habré to justice receives Right Livelihood Award

Jacqueline Moudeina, a leader in the fight to bring former Chadian dictator Hissène Habré to justice receives Right Livelihood Award

Jacqueline Moudeina is president of the Chadian Association for the Promotion and Defense of Human Rights (ATPDH) and has been the lawyer for the victims of the former dictator Hissène Habré since 2000. In 2001, Ms. Moudeina was seriously injured by a grenade thrown by security forces commanded by a former officer in Hissène Habré’s political police.
On December 5, 2011, Ms. Moudeina received the Right Livelihood Award 2011, which is considered to be the “Alternative Nobel Prize,” “for her tireless efforts at great personal risk to win justice for the victims of the former dictatorship in Chad and to increase awareness and observance of human rights in Africa” (http://www.rightlivelihood.org [4]).

This is her acceptance speech delivered at the Swedish parliament in Stockholm on December 5, 2011.

*****

Jacqueline Moudeina’s Remarks for the “Right Livelihood Award”

Honorable Ladies and Gentlemen,

Allow me to begin by sincerely thanking you for the distinguished honor that you are bestowing upon me through the “Right Livelihood Award.” This award recognizes me specifically but, beyond that, rewards all the human rights defenders in the world, and particularly in Africa.

Rest assured that it is a deeply encouraging sign for us, the human rights defenders, and especially for us, the women, who fight on a daily basis, in very difficult conditions, sometimes at the risk of our own lives, in a world where power is generally held by men. This award gives us the courage to continue our different struggles on a road fraught with pitfalls.

Fighting for victims is in my genes. I am a rebel who from an early age has been indignant in the face of abuse, and I cannot bear injustice. I have always felt this way and always will, as long as those who suffer injustice are ignored by their leaders and as long as justice is selective. Many have tried to prevent me from doing my work; many have tried to intimidate me, to psychologically and physically threaten me. But I have come to understand, as Alexis Voinov said in Albert Camus’ The Just Assassins, that “it isnot enough to speak out against injustice. You have to dedicate your life to fighting it.” Until now, no one has managed to discourage me or get the better of me. I will continue my fight.

Ladies and Gentlemen,

I will seize this occasion to tell you about one aspect of our struggle for human rights: the fight against impunity.

In the past twenty years, the international community has undeniably made major strides in the fight against impunity for the worst criminals. But in Africa, much remains to be done. On this continent, impunity is a cancer that, with its corollary disease corruption, has infected our body politic and prevents us from realizing our true potential. We, the members of civil society, are fighting against this cancer, from Tunis to Harare, from Dakar to Khartoum, and in other places like Abidjan, Tripoli, and N’Djamena.

And yet, this justice that I am speaking about is not a science in the making. It isn’t a utopia. It is the most fundamental form of justice: criminal justice that allows victims to wash away the worst horrors, that gives back dignity to men who were tortured, and that gives back courage to women who have lost hope.

You only need to look at our struggle to bring to justice the former dictator of my country, Hissène Habré, to understand that today, in the twenty-first century, more than sixty years after the Nuremberg trials, it is sometimes easier to resort to oppression than to abide by the law, easier to commit violence than to deliver justice!

Habré ruled Chad from 1982 to 1990 until his overthrow and exile in Senegal. During his reign, atrocities were committed on a large scale, waves of ethnic cleansing crashed down on individual groups, and torture was institutionalized. In 1992, a national Commission of Inquiry estimated that his regime was responsible for the death of more than 40,000 people and the disappearance of thousands of individuals, leaving in its wake innumerable widows and orphans.

The victims of the Habré regime, whom I represent, have fought tirelessly for justice for twenty-one years. But to date their struggle remains unfinished. Before leaving power, Hissène Habré emptied out Chad’s national coffers and has skillfully used these funds in Senegal to weave himself a powerful network of protection. And so, instead of allowing the victims’ case to be heard, Senegal and the African Union have subjected them to what Archbishop Desmond Tutu and 117 organizations from twenty-five African countries rightly denounced as an “interminable political and legal soap opera.” I would say even more: a true stations of the cross for the victims.

In January 2000, we filed a complaint against Hissène Habré in Senegal where he now lives. One month later, the decision by a Senegalese judge to indict Habré gave us real hope.

However, following political inference, denounced by the United Nations, the Senegalese courts declared that they lacked jurisdiction.

The victims then turned toward Belgium which offered them a path to justice. After a four-year investigation, a Belgian judge issued an international arrest warrant against Habré in 2005. The victims once again felt real hope that they might see Hissène Habré brought to justice for his alleged crimes.

But once again, the victims were disappointed when Senegal refused to extradite Habré to Belgium.

In May 2006, the UN Committee against Torture condemned Senegal for its failure to act and enjoined Senegal to prosecute or extradite the former Chadian dictator.

In July 2006, the heads of state and government leaders of the African Union gave Senegal a mandate to prosecute Habré “in the name of Africa.” It was another step forward.

But our renewed hope to see Habré tried was short-lived. For four years, Senegal conditioned the start of investigations on the up-front payment by the international community of all the costs of the trial. When the international community committed to such payment, President Abdoulaye Wade of Senegal suddenly refused to execute the mandate conferred by the African Union and, in June 2011, finally declared that Senegal would not prosecute Hissène Habré.

Since then, Belgium, a country to which I express thanks on behalf of all the victims, has renewed its extradition request.

But now, the African Union now talks of sending Habré to Rwanda and starting everything all over again. What an outrage! What a loss of time, when the surviving victims are dying one after the other! More than a dozen victims have passed away this year alone. A request to transfer Habré to Rwanda would entail many more years of waiting, the time that it would take for Rwanda to create an adequate legislative framework, to conduct an investigation, and to issue an extradition request, whereas a trial in Belgium could take place quickly.

This is yet another dilatory tactic by the African Union, and calls into question the institution’s commitment to the fight against impunity. With a few exceptions, African leaders, who say that they want to free themselves of the tutelage of international tribunals and the extradition requests of Western countries, are revealing that they form nothing more than a club of heads of states ensuring their own impunity.

It is time for Senegal to grant victims the justice that they have demanded by extraditing Habré to Belgium where he can be tried. The victims cannot wait any longer. Psychologically and physically, they have suffered severe trauma that has taken a heavy toll over the years.

The Chadian government itself, last July, requested, and I quote, that the “option to extradite Habré to Belgium to face trial be given priority.” Why is President Wade denying us justice? Why is the African Union failing to listen to the victims? Why do Senegal and the African Union not support the position of Chad, the country most directly concerned by this case, which is to see Habré tried in Belgium?

I would like to seize this opportunity today to voice the victims’ plea, and to call on Senegal to extradite Habré to Belgium, to enable them at last to obtain justice.

This case isn’t just about one man, however, but rather it is about one of the most tyrannical regimes of the last century.This regime is usually identified with one man, Habré, but we have not forgotten about his accomplices, the executioners and torturers who carried out the former dictator’s orders. These ex-agents of Habré’s terrifying political police, known as the “Documentation and Security Directorate,” must also face justice before the Chadian courts and must be removed from public service. This was already one of the main recommendations of the National Commission of Inquiry in 1992.

Some of these accomplices continue to haunt us by taunting and threatening us in our daily lives. But we will not drop this fight. I myself was targeted in 2001 for my involvement in the Habré case. During a peaceful march in favor of democracy, a police squad attempted to assassinate me with a grenade. Its commander was none other than a former torturer against whom the victims had initiated a judicial procedure in Chad.

This event illustrates the educational value of a trial: how could this former torturer still believe that a dictator’s weapon is more powerful than a judge’s gavel? Despite this attempted assassination, I have never relented, and I will continue my efforts until Habré and the other executioners are brought to justice.

Ladies and Gentlemen,

The challenge of our struggle, above and beyond the trial of one individual, is that of national union for a lasting peace in my country. Today, the trial of Hissène Habré and his accomplices would allow the Chadian people to begin, at last, the reconstruction of their country. And it is only at the end of this process that the Chadian people will be able to truly come together and enjoy a rebirth.

In the struggle to end the impunity of some powerful leaders, justice has so far been an elusive dream. But this award which you bestow on me today is a tribute to the thousands of victims, widows, and orphans.

And it is to these individuals that I dedicate this award. We will not give up.This award reaffirms that we are right and encourages us to continue our fight against impunity.

Thank you for your attention.

Source URL: http://www.hrw.org/news/2011/12/06/impunity-cancer-prevents-us-realizing-our-true-potential
Links:
[1] http://www.hrw.org/news/2011/12/06/impunity-cancer-prevents-us-realizing-our-true-potential
[2] http://twitter.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.hrw.org%2Fnews%2F2011%2F12%2F06%2Fimpunity-cancer-prevents-us-realizing-our-true-potential&count=horizontal&via=&text=%E2%80%9CImpunity%20is%20a%20cancer%20that%20prevents%20us%20from%20realizing%20our%20true%20potential%E2%80%9D&counturl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.hrw.org%2Fnews%2F2011%2F12%2F06%2Fimpunity-cancer-prevents-us-realizing-our-true-potential
[3] http://www.facebook.com/plugins/like.php?href=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.hrw.org%2Fnews%2F2011%2F12%2F06%2Fimpunity-cancer-prevents-us-realizing-our-true-potential&layout=button_count&show_faces=false&action=recommend&colorscheme=light&width=100&height=21&font=&locale=
[4] http://www.rightlivelihood.org


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 44 other followers