Senegal will lose US aid if fails to extradite Habre: NGO

January 11, 2012
Senegalese President Abdoulaye Wade

Senegalese President Abdoulaye Wade

Senegal risks losing up to $50 million in US aid if it fails to bring former Chadian dictator Hissene Habre to justice, a regional rights group warned Wednesday.

“More than 25 billion CFA francs risk being completely jeopardised by Senegal’s inability to comply with its international obligations and try or extradite Hissene Habre,” RADDHO said in a statement.

The Dakar-based African Assembly for the Defence of Human Rights said said that while Washington had earmarked the amount for Senegal, some US representatives had voiced concern over the lack of progress in the Habre case.

Habre, dubbed Africa’s Pinochet for atrocities committed under his rule, has been living in Senegal since fleeing his country in 1990 after being ousted by President Idriss Deby Itno. He had ruled for eight years.

A 1992 truth commission report in Chad said that during his time in power, Habre presided over up to 40,000 political murders and widespread torture.

While mandated by the African Union to put Habre on trial, Senegal has dragged its feet for years.

Last year, Senegalese President Abdoulaye Wade announced he would send Habre back to Chad but backed down at the last minute under pressure from rights groups and the United Nations.

The 85-year-old Wade, who is controversially seeking another term in office in an election next month, said earlier this month in an interview that Habre’s extradition to Belgium was imminent.

“Very probably, Hissene Habre will be sent to Belgium. I have referred Belgium’s request to the Dakar court of appeal. If the court decides it, he will be extradited,” he said.

Belgium has wanted to try Habre since 2005, when it issued an international arrest warrant for “serious violations of international humanitarian law”.


Senegal rejects extradition of Chad’s Habre to Belgium

January 11, 2012
Senegal rejects extradition of Chad's Habre to Belgium

Senegal rejects extradition of Chad's Habre to Belgium

(AFP) – DAKAR — Senegal’s appeals court on Wednesday rejected a Belgian request for Chad’s former president Hissene Habre to be extradited to face charges of atrocities committed during his 1982-1990 rule.

“The Dakar Appeals Court today rejected the request to have Hissene Habre extradited to Belgium. It ruled that Belgium’s demand did not conform to legal provisions” in Senegal, said an official from the justice ministry.

“Belgium did not respect the procedure,” he said, without giving details.

Belgium had proposed in July that Habre be extradited, with support from the Chadian government.

Reed Brody, a lawyer with Human Rights Watch who has spearheaded the case against Habre, said the ruling was not definitive.

“They did not refuse extradition, they said Belgium had not annexed the original arrest warrant and other papers” only photocopied versions, he told AFP by telephone from Belgium.

“It is purely a technical ruling. It leaves the door open to a fresh Belgian extradition request… it is not a definitive ruling on the merits of the case.”

Brody was part of a Belgian investigating team that visited Chad in 2002, where they visited detention centres and mass graves and found thousands of documents from Habre’s political police, providing strong evidence of torture and rights violations.

Habre, dubbed Africa’s Pinochet for atrocities committed under his rule, has been living in Senegal since fleeing his country in 1990 after being ousted by President Idriss Deby Itno. He had ruled for eight years.

A 1992 truth commission report in Chad said that during his time in power, Habre presided over up to 40,000 political murders and widespread torture.

While mandated by the African Union to put Habre on trial, Senegal has dragged its feet for years.

Last year, Senegalese President Abdoulaye Wade announced he would send Habre back to Chad but backed down at the last minute under pressure from rights groups and the United Nations.

The 85-year-old Wade, who is controversially seeking another term in office in an election next month, said earlier this month in an interview that Habre’s extradition to Belgium was imminent.

“Very probably, Hissene Habre will be sent to Belgium. I have referred Belgium’s request to the Dakar court of appeal. If the court decides it, he will be extradited,” he said.

Belgium has wanted to try Habre since 2005, when it issued an international arrest warrant for “serious violations of international humanitarian law”.

The Dakar-based African Assembly for the Defence of Human Rights warned that Senegal risks losing up to $50 million (39 million euros) in US aid if it fails to bring Habre to justice.

“More than 25 billion CFA francs risk being completely jeopardised by Senegal’s inability to comply with its international obligations and try or extradite Hissene Habre,” RADDHO said in a statement.

The rights body said that while Washington had earmarked the amount for Senegal, some US representatives had voiced concern over the lack of progress in the Habre case.


His name was Idriss Miskine…

January 8, 2012
Idriss Miskine (Photo: TchadSao Facebook Page)

Idriss Miskine (Photo: TchadSao Facebook Page)

On January 7, 1984 this man died. His name was Idriss Miskine. Comrade and confidant of Habré, he was poisoned by him. It is what his family and large sectors of the Chadian society believe to this day.
R.I.P.!


Affaire Habré : Le président sénégalais Wade déclare que l’ancien dictateur tchadien sera « très probablement renvoyé en Belgique »

January 6, 2012
Habre victims ( Photo: HRW)

Habre victims ( Photo: HRW)

(N’Djaména) – La déclaration du président sénégalais Abdoulaye Wade que « très probablement Hissène Habré va être renvoyé en Belgique » pour répondre aux accusations de crimes contre l’humanité, crimes de guerre, et torture suscite l’espoir des victimes, a déclaré le Comité international pour le jugement équitable de Hissène Habré. La déclaration, retransmise aujourd’hui, a été faite lors d’une interview avec Radio France internationale et France 24 le 4 janvier 2012 au Palais présidentiel de Dakar.

Le président Wade, qui avait catégoriquement refusé que Habré soit jugé au Sénégal, a déclaré que la Cour d’appel de Dakar, actuellement saisie d’une demande d’extradition belge, va « incessamment trancher la question ». Il a ajouté que « si la Cour d’appel décide de l’extrader, je l’extraderai » car il a désormais « l’aval » de l’Union africaine.

« Nous sommes rassurés de voir que les tribunaux vont bientôt traiter la demande d’extradition belge et que le gouvernement sénégalais tient à respecter la décision de la cour », a déclaré Jacqueline Moudeïna, avocate des victimes et coordinatrice du Comité international pour le jugement équitable de Hissène Habré qui comprend notamment l’Association tchadienne pour la Promotion et la Défense des Droits de l’Homme (ATPDH), l’Association des Victimes des Crimes du Régime de Hissène Habré (AVCRHH), la Rencontre Africaine pour la Défense des Droits de l’Homme (RADDHO), Human Rights Watch et la Fédération internationale des Ligues des Droits de l’Homme (FIDH). « Si l’indépendance judiciaire est respectée au Sénégal, il n’y a pas d’autre solution que l’extradition en Belgique car le Sénégal est obligé soit de le juger, soit de l’extrader ».

Les victimes de l’ancien dictateur tchadien luttent depuis plus de vingt-et-un ans pour le traduire devant un tribunal mais se trouvent devant une impasse depuis que le Sénégal, pays d’exil de Habré, a décidé de ne pas le juger, sans pour autant l’extrader vers la Belgique qui demande son extradition depuis 2005. La Convention contre la torture oblige les Etats parties à juger ou extrader toute personne accusée de torture.

En juillet 2006, le Sénégal a accepté le mandat de l’Union africaine de juger Habré « au nom de l’Afrique ». Au moment où les dernières modalités se mettaient en place l’année dernière, le Sénégal s’est retiré des discussions avec l’Union africaine et a déclaré qu’il ne jugerait jamais Habré. En juin 2011, l’Union africaine a fait le bilan de l’affaire et a envisagé d’autres solutions, y compris son extradition vers la Belgique. Le 22 juillet 2011, le gouvernement tchadien s’est prononcé officiellement en faveur de l’extradition de Habré en Belgique.

La Belgique a déposé une troisième demande d’extradition le 5 septembre 2011. La demande est toujours pendante.

En novembre dernier, le Comité des Nations unies contre la torture rappelait au Sénégal son obligation « de soumettre la présente affaire à ses autorités compétentes pour l’exercice de l’action pénale ou, à défaut, dans la mesure où il existe une demande d’extradition émanant de la Belgique, de faire droit à cette demande ».

« L’extradition de Habré vers la Belgique constitue l’option la plus concrète et la plus rapide pour s’assurer qu’il réponde effectivement des accusations portées contre lui dans le cadre d’un procès juste et équitable », a ajouté Maître Moudeina. « Les victimes continuent de s’éteindre tous les jours et n’ont plus le temps d’attendre. La Belgique a déjà enquêté sur les accusations et est prête à juger Habré rapidement une fois qu’il sera sur son territoire ».

Le refus du Sénégal de juger Habré sera à l’ordre du jour au sommet de l’Union africaine à la fin du mois de janvier. Dès mars prochain, les audiences débuteront à la Cour internationale de Justice dans l’affaire qui oppose la Belgique au Sénégal visant à obliger le Sénégal à s’acquitter de ses obligations internationales.

Habré a dirigé le Tchad de 1982 à 1990, jusqu’à ce qu’il soit renversé par l’actuel président tchadien Idriss Déby Itno. Son régime à parti unique a été marqué par des atrocités commises à grande échelle, notamment par des vagues d’épurations ethniques. Une commission d’enquête nationale a estimé en 1992 que le régime était responsable de 40 000 assassinats politiques et de torture systématique.

Interview du Président Wade :

Rfi : Alors justement, Monsieur le Président, en janvier l’Union africaine aura à se pencher à nouveau sur le dossier Hissène Habré, vous savez qu’il y a deux solutions actuellement à envisager : l’extradition vers la Belgique, un éventuel départ vers le Rwanda. Quelle solution recueillerait plutôt votre avis ?

Wade : La Cour d’appel de Dakar, [est] actuellement saisie d’une demande de la Belgique, et incessamment elle va trancher la question. Mais très probablement Hissène Habré va être renvoyé en Belgique. Je ne l’aurais pas fait avant si je n’avais pas l’aval de l’Union africaine. Mais l’Union africaine nous dit, me dit, que c’est une possibilité et donc si la Cour d’appel décide de l’extrader, je l’extraderai.

Rfi : Donc juste en deux mots, vous êtes prêt si les formes sont respectées à ce qu’il aille en Belgique ?

Wade : Absolument ! Parce que j’ai le couvert de l’Union africaine. Auparavant je ne l’aurais pas fait.


Me Wade annonce une extradition probable de Habré vers la Belgique

January 5, 2012
Me Wade annonce une extradition probable de Habré vers la Belgique

Me Wade annonce une extradition probable de Habré vers la Belgique (Photo: APS)

Dakar, 5 jan (APS) – L’ancien président tchadien Hissène Habré, en exil à Dakar depuis sa chute en 1990, va être ‘’très probablement’’ renvoyé prochainement en Belgique pour y être jugé, notamment sur la demande des représentants de personnes présentées comme des victimes de son régime, a indiqué jeudi le chef de l’Etat sénégalais, Abdoulaye Wade.

‘’La Cour d’appel de Dakar est actuellement saisie d’une demande de la Belgique. Et incessamment, elle va transférer la question. Et très probablement, Hissène Habré va être renvoyé en Belgique’’, a-t-il déclaré sur RFI

‘’Je ne l’aurais pas fait (extrader Habré) avant, si je n’avais pas l’aval de l’Union africaine. Mais l’Union africaine nous dit, me dit, que c’est une possibilité. Et donc si la Cour d’appel décide de l’extrader, je l’extraderai’’, a ajouté Me Wade.

A la question de savoir s’il est prêt à le renvoyer en Belgique ‘’si les formes sont respectées’’, le président Wade a répondu : ‘’Absolument, parce que je suis couvert par l’Union africaine’’.

A l’issue de son sommet tenu en juillet 2006 à Banjul, l’UA avait demandé au Sénégal d’organiser le procès de M. Habré. Pour ce faire, le pays a été obligé d’opérer une révision de sa loi.

Suite à une plainte des avocats de Hissène Habré, la Cour de justice de la Communauté économique des Etats de l’Afrique de l’ouest (CEDEAO) a demandé récemment la mise en place d’un Tribunal spécial, estimant que le Sénégal n’a pas le droit de juger Habré par une loi rétroactive.

L’arrêt de la Cour a été rendu au moment où le Sénégal s’apprêtait à abriter une rencontre des bailleurs de fonds pour le financement du procès de l’ancien homme fort de Ndjamena.

Commentant le verdict rendu par la Cour de justice de la CEDEAO, le président Wade considère qu’il y a ’’une contradiction’’ entre cette décision et le souhait de l’Union africaine de faire juger Habré par le Sénégal.

Partant, les autorités sénégalaises avaient annoncé avoir décidé de retourner à l’Union africaine le dossier de l’ancien président tchadien Hissène Habré, mais exprimé le souhait que celui-ci “soit jugé en terre africaine.

Il devait être rapatrié vers son pays le 11 juillet dernier par les autorités sénégalaises, qui ont interrompu ce processus, à la demande expresse de Navi Pillay, le Haut commissaire des Nations unies aux droits de l’homme.

De nombreuses organisations notamment de défense des droits de l’homme ont en effet fait valoir qu’Hissène Habré ne peut bénéficier dans son pays d’un procès équitable. Ils ont demandé qu’il soit donc extradé vers la Belgique qui a déjà formulé une demande dans ce sens.

Présumé coupable de crimes contre l’humanité et de crimes de guerre, Hissène Habré a admis dans une interview parue dans l’hebdomadaire sénégalais La Gazette (privée), que des dérives et des règlements de comptes ont été commis au Tchad sous son régime. Il a sur cette base demandé à être jugé par une juridiction internationale indépendante.

‘’Je ne nie pas que sous mon régime il y a eu des dérives ou ce qu’on appelle des bavures. […] Incontestablement, il y a [eu] des règlements de comptes, je ne le nie pas’’, a-t-il dit, ajoutant qu’à son arrivée au pouvoir, le Tchad ‘’était divisé en 11 tendances’’.

‘’Chaque tendance avait son territoire, son Etat, son armée et son administration. […] Dans un pays comme ça, en proie à la guerre, forcément tout le monde n’est pas saint dans l’armée, dans la police et dans la gendarmerie’’, a fait valoir Hissène Habré.

‘’On veut rendre justice au Tchad et aux Tchadiens, n’est-ce pas ? Je suis totalement consentant. Je suis totalement d’accord qu’on organise une justice internationale indépendante, selon les normes du droit’’, a-t-il encore dit.

‘’Que tous les Tchadiens à qui on reproche quelque chose viennent se présenter devant cette juridiction. Y compris Hissène Habré, y compris les anciens présidents du Tchad’’, a-t-il soutenu. ‘’Pourquoi je dois être le seul à être jugé ?’’

Il est accusé de plusieurs milliers d’assassinats politiques et de torture systématique pendant les huit années de sa présidence (1982 à 1990), des violations qualifiées de crimes contre l’humanité et de crimes de guerre.

BK/OID
http://www.youtube-nocookie.com/v/4NlbKTuBGgg?version=3&hl=en_US&rel=0


(…) if you kill 40, 000 people, you get a comfortable exile with a bank account in another country (…)

December 27, 2011

Reed Brody, HRW

“If you kill one person, you go to jail. If you kill 40 people, they put you in an insane asylum. But if you kill 40, 000 people, you get a comfortable exile with a bank account in another country, and that’s what we want to change here,”
Reed Brody, Human Rights Watch


Chad’s Genocide: Missed by the Media

December 27, 2011

Masses of information from the media constantly bombard us yet, paradoxically, often the most important goes uncovered. Take for instance, Africa. A country like Sudan suddenly comes under the spotlight. Reports of rape, massacre and corruption in the Darfur region reinforce all the stereotypes about the “dark continent” of savage aliens. And then, just as quickly, Sudan will fall from view.

Masses of information from the media constantly bombard us yet, paradoxically, often the most important goes uncovered. Take for instance, Africa. A country like Sudan suddenly comes under the spotlight. Reports of rape, massacre and corruption in the Darfur region reinforce all the stereotypes about the “dark continent” of savage aliens. And then, just as quickly, Sudan will fall from view. However, while thousands of refugees from the Darfur conflict have fled to Chad, just to the west of Sudan, this country remains largely off the British and American media map.

And so one of the most remarkable contemporary human rights campaigns goes largely unreported in the UK as the Belgium courts seek to try the former Chadian dictator Hissène Habré for crimes of genocide during his rule from 1982 to 1990 – even in the face of the Belgium Parliament’s decision to repeal its landmark “universal human rights jurisdiction” statute. Following threats from the United States in June 2003 that Belgium risked losing its status as host to NATO’s headquarters, the 1993 historic law, which allowed victims to file complaints in Belgium for atrocities committed abroad, was repealed. Yet a new law, adopted in August 2003, allowed for the continuation of the case against Habré – much to the delight of human rights campaigners. And finally last month, Senegal, where Habré has been under house arrest, arrested the former dictator to face an extradition request from Belgium over the genocide charges.

Formerly part of French Equatorial Africa, Chad gained its independence in 1960 and since then has been gripped by civil war. In a rare instance of coverage on 21 May 1992, the London-based Guardian carried four short paragraphs reporting how 40,000 people were estimated to have died in detention or been executed during the tyranny of Habré. A justice ministry report concluded that Habré had committed genocide against the Chadian people. Five years ago, in a case inspired by the one against Chile’s General Augusto Pinochet, several human rights organisations, led by Human Rights Watch, filed a suit against Habré in Senegal (his refuge since 1990). They argued that he could be tried anywhere for crimes against humanity and that former heads of state were not immune. However, on 21 March 2001, the Senegal Court of Cassation threw out the case. And so, human rights campaigners turned their attention to Belgium where one of the victims of Habré’s torture now lives. Extraordinary events, but all of them hidden behind a virtual wall of silence in the West.

Yet also hidden is the massive, secret war waged by the United States and Britain from bases in Chad against Libya. British involvement in a 1996 plot to assassinate the Libyan leader, Colonel Mu’ammar Gadafi, as alleged by the maverick M15 officer David Shayler, was reported as an isolated event. Yet it is best seen as part of a wide-ranging and longstanding strategy of the US and UK secret states to remove Gadafi. Grabbing power by ousting King Idris in a 1969 coup, Gadafi (who, intriguingly, had followed a military training course in England in 1966) soon became the target of covert operations by the French, Americans, Israelis and British. Stephen Dorril, in his seminal history of M16, records how in 1971 a British plan to invade the country, release political prisoners and restore the monarchy ended in an embarrassing flop. Nine years later, the head of the French secret service, Alain de Gaigneronde de Marolles, resigned after a French-led plan ended in disaster when a rebellion by Libyan troops in Tobruk was quickly suppressed. Then, in 1982, away from the glare of the media, Habré, with the backing of the CIA and French troops, overthrew the Chadian government of Goukouni Wedeye. Bob Woodward (of Watergate fame), in his semi-official history of the CIA, reveals that the Chad covert operation was the first undertaken by the new CIA chief William Casey and that, throughout the decade, Libya ranked as high as the Soviet Union as the bête noir of the White House.

A report from Amnesty International, Chad: The Habré Legacy, records massive military and financial support for the dictator by the US Congress. It adds: “None of the documents presented to Congress and consulted by AI covering the period 1984 to 1989 make any reference to human rights violations.” US official records indicate that funds for the Chad-based covert war against Libya also came from Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Morocco, Israel and Iraq. The Saudis, for instance, gave $7million to an opposition group, the National Front for the Salvation of Libya (also backed by French intelligence and the CIA). However, a plan to assassinate Gadafi and seize power on 8 May 1984 was crushed. In the following year, the US asked Egypt to invade Libya and overthrow Gadafi but President Mubarak refused. By the end of 1985, the Washington Post had exposed the plan after congressional leaders opposing it wrote in protest to President Reagan. Frustrated in its covert attempts to topple Gadafi, the US government’s strategy suddenly shifted. For 11 minutes in the early morning of 14 April 1986, 30 US air force and navy bombers struck Tripoli and Benghazi in a raid code-named El Dorado Canyon. The US/UK mainstream media were ecstatic. Yet the main purpose of the raid was to kill the Libyan president – dubbed a “mad dog” by Reagan. In the event, the first bomb to drop on Tripoli hit Gadafi’s home killing Hana, his adopted daughter aged 15 months – while his eight other children and wife Safiya were all hospitalised, some with serious injuries. The president escaped. Reports of US military action against Libya disappeared from the media after the 1986 assault. But away from the glare of publicity, the CIA launched its most extensive effort yet to spark an anti-Gadafi coup. A secret army was recruited from among the many Libyans captured in border battles with Chad during the 1980s. And as concerns grew in M16 that Gadafi was aiming to develop chemical weapons, Britain funded various opposition groups in Libya. Then in 1990, with the crisis in the Gulf developing, French troops helped oust Habré in a secret operation and install Idriss Déby as the new President of Chad. The French government had tired of Habré’s genocidal policies while George Bush senior’s administration decided not to frustrate France in exchange for co-operation in its attack on Iraq. Yet, even under Déby, abuses of civil rights by government forces have continued.

Recently, relations between the US, UK and Libya have thawed, with Gadafi pledging support for the “war against terrorism” and agreeing to pay compensation to the victims of the 1988 Flight 103 Lockerbie bombing, for which a Libyan intelligence agent was jailed. But significantly, at his trial in November 2003, David Shayler was denied the right (under the European Convention of Human Rights) to speak out about the 1996 anti-Gadafi plot. Since it is obvious there are a lot of shady secrets from the years of the dirty war to conceal, such a decision by the court must have come as a relief to the government. And a report in the Guardian of 15 March 2004 said US troops were arriving in several African countries, including Chad, as the Pentagon warned that the region ran the risk of becoming an al-Qaeda recruiting ground. Giles Tremlett reported (“US sends special forces into North Africa”): “…US navy P-3 Orion aircraft guided Chad troops during a two-day battle on the border with Niger last week in which 43 suspected members of Algeria’s Salafist Group for Preaching and Combat were killed.” Oil reserves in North and West Africa are drawing increasing attention from the US. West Africa supplies the US with 15 per cent of its oil while the US National Intelligence Council has projected the figure will grow to 25 per cent by 2015.

___

Richard Keeble. February 2006

Richard Keeble is Professor of Journalism at Lincoln University. His publications include Secret State, Silent Press (John Libbey; 1997), a study of the US/UK press coverage of the 1991 Gulf conflict. This excerpt is taken from his blog on Media Lens.


We’re never gonna give up! We’ll keep fighting to see justice done for the thousands of victims!

December 24, 2011

Bring this P.O.S. to justice! Senegal must prosecute the S.O.B. or hand him to the international justice! It’s as simple as that. We’re never gonna give up! We’ll keep fighting to see justice done for the thousands of victims. I, for one, won’t quit. I owe it to my 9 years younger brother murdered by Habre’s soldiers in Deli. I owe it to my dad’s two brothers who were abducted and murdered during Habre’s iron fist rule. I owe my dad’s 15 colleagues cold bloodily shot and killed on a September morning in Deli. I owe it to the more than hundred people killed in Deli that day. I owe it to all the victims of Black September in Southern Chad, to the victims of the pogrom against the Hadjerai, the massacres of the Zaghawa, Arabs,… Yes, we owe it to ALL the victims of Habre and Deby’s dictatorships and to future generations to prevent something of this magnitude from happening again. It’s our moral obligation. It’s our duty!


Bring Hissene Habre To Justice!

December 23, 2011

Senegal has an obligation to put Hissene Habre on trial for his crimes committed against the Chadian people between 1982-1990. If Senegal doesn’t want to stand with the victims of that monster, Senegal must hand him to countries like Belgium that offer to prosecute him. I hope the legendary Senegalese “Teranga” ( hospitality) doesn’t mean giving a safe haven to criminals, mass murderers and torturers, genocide perpetrators like Hissene Habre. Bring Bring Hissene Habre to Justice! That’s all the survivors of Habre’s gulags, the thousands of orphans, widows, widowers, …the families of the victims have been asking for for more than two decades.


United Nations: A Move Toward Prosecuting Chad’s Ex-Dictator

November 29, 2011

Torture Panel Tells Senegal to Prosecute or Extradite Habré

(Geneva) – The United Nations Committee against Torture (“the Committee”) has called on Senegal to comply with its obligation to prosecute or extradite Chad’s exiled former dictator, Hissène Habré, Human Rights Watch said today.

The Committee’s action came after Senegal announced that it would not prosecute Habré in Senegal, and Belgium introduced a new extradition request to try Habré.

“The UN has stood up for Habre’s thousands of victims who have been seeking justice from Senegal for 21 years,” said Reed Brody, counsel with Human Rights Watch, who represents the victims before the Committee. “Since Senegal refuses to prosecute Habré, it needs to extradite him to Belgium right away.”

Habré is accused of thousands of political killings and systematic torture when he ruled Chad from 1982 to 1990, before fleeing to Senegal. The government of Senegal over the years has refused, then agreed under pressure, and finally refused again to prosecute him.

The Committee consists of 10 experts elected by the 149 states that have ratified the UN Convention against Torture. In 2006, following a petition by Habré’s victims, the Committee found Senegal in breach of its legal duty to bring Habré to justice. In a letter to Senegal’s permanent representative in Geneva dated November 24, 2011,the Committee’s rapporteur, Fernando Mariño, recalled its 2006 decision and said that if Senegal was not going to prosecute Habré, it must, under the convention, extradite him to Belgium or another country that will prosecute him.

In the letter, the UN rapporteur noted that Senegal had failed to institute action against Habré and said that “the Committee wishes therefore to remind [Senegal] of its obligation under the Convention against Torture, to submit the case to its competent authorities for the purpose of prosecution or failing that, since Belgium has made an extradition request, to comply with that request,” or another extradition request made pursuant to the convention.

In July 2010, Archbishop Desmond Tutu and 117 groups from 25 African countries denounced the “interminable political and legal soap opera” to which Habré’s victims had been subjected over 20 years.

Habré was first indicted in Senegal in 2000, but following political interference, the country’s courts said that he could not be tried there. His victims then filed a case in Belgium. After years of investigation, in September 2005, a Belgian judge requested his extradition. Senegal asked the African Union (AU) to recommend a course of action, and in July 2006, the AU called on Senegal to prosecute Habré “on behalf of Africa.” Years of stalling ensued, however, even after international donors fully funded the US$11.9 million trial budget in November 2010.

In May, Senegal walked out of talks with the AU over the trial and made clear that it would not prosecute Habré in Senegal. On July 10, President Abdoulaye Wade of Senegal reversed a decision announced two days earlier to expel Habré to Chad, where he has been sentenced to death in absentia.

Belgium then made a new extradition request, which is pending. On July 22, the government of Chad announced that it was in favor of extraditing Habré to Belgium. Although Rwanda recently announced that it was also willing to try Habré in its courts, Human Rights Watch and Habré’s victims believe that this option would lead to many more years of delay before the trial could be held.


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 33 other followers